PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENPH vs. TAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENPH vs. TAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENPH achieves a 39.88% return, which is significantly higher than TAN's 11.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ENPH has outperformed TAN with an annualized return of 36.14%, while TAN has yielded a comparatively lower 10.62% annualized return.


ENPH

1D
-0.13%
1M
-17.88%
6M
27.29%
YTD
39.88%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
-36.34%
5Y*
-24.59%
10Y*
36.14%

TAN

1D
0.02%
1M
-12.80%
6M
9.26%
YTD
11.89%
1Y
44.25%
3Y*
-7.28%
5Y*
-8.92%
10Y*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENPH vs. TAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
39.88%-53.33%-48.02%-50.13%44.83%4.26%571.53%452.43%96.27%138.61%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
11.89%48.31%-37.61%-26.79%-5.24%-25.10%233.96%66.53%-25.67%54.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ENPH and TAN is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012

0.63

The correlation between ENPH and TAN shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENPH vs. TAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENPH
ENPH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ENPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENPH Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ENPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENPH Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

TAN
TAN Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
TAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAN Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENPH vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENPHTANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.19

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

1.55

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

4.94

-4.74

ENPH vs. TAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENPH Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the TAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENPH and TAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENPH vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENPH drawdown since its inception was -95.97%, roughly equal to the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENPH and TAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENPHTANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.97%

-95.29%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.56%

-26.77%

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.23%

-64.40%

-21.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.23%

-73.95%

-18.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.23%

-78.53%

-13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.66%

-74.76%

-11.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.75%

-78.46%

+27.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.00%

8.38%

+14.62%

Volatility

ENPH vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison

Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) has a higher volatility of 22.51% compared to Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) at 12.73%. This indicates that ENPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENPHTANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.51%

12.73%

+9.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.68%

28.70%

+39.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.30%

38.29%

+45.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.56%

40.11%

+30.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.31%

38.16%

+40.15%

Dividends

ENPH vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENPH nor TAN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.30%0.69%1.77%5.04%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENPH and TAN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENPH has higher volatility (22.51%) compared to TAN (12.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENPH dropped -95.97% vs TAN's -95.29%.

TAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENPH and TAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer