PortfoliosLab logo
EMXC vs. VPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and VPL is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EMXC vs. VPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EMXC:

0.28

VPL:

0.35

Sortino Ratio

EMXC:

0.52

VPL:

0.61

Omega Ratio

EMXC:

1.07

VPL:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

EMXC:

0.26

VPL:

0.39

Martin Ratio

EMXC:

0.68

VPL:

1.15

Ulcer Index

EMXC:

7.20%

VPL:

5.53%

Daily Std Dev

EMXC:

17.80%

VPL:

19.16%

Max Drawdown

EMXC:

-42.80%

VPL:

-55.49%

Current Drawdown

EMXC:

-2.92%

VPL:

-0.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly lower than VPL's 9.85% return.


EMXC

YTD

8.40%

1M

10.56%

6M

5.69%

1Y

4.89%

3Y*

7.10%

5Y*

10.97%

10Y*

N/A

VPL

YTD

9.85%

1M

7.24%

6M

7.65%

1Y

6.65%

3Y*

7.47%

5Y*

8.19%

10Y*

4.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF

EMXC vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EMXC vs. VPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMXC is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMXC is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMXC is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMXC is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMXC is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMXC is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VPL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VPL is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VPL is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VPL is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VPL is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VPL is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VPL is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EMXC vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is comparable to the VPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and VPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EMXC vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than VPL's 3.05% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.48%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
3.05%3.15%3.12%2.75%3.19%1.81%2.85%3.06%2.57%2.65%2.43%2.69%

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.80%, smaller than the maximum VPL drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and VPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EMXC vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) at 3.41%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...