PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMR vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMR vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMR vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
0.12%8.92%29.73%3.75%5.74%18.19%8.61%31.53%-11.87%29.05%
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
8.77%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 8.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EMR has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 12.05%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.79% annualized return.


EMR

1D
1.03%
1M
-12.96%
YTD
0.12%
6M
1.73%
1Y
22.34%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
12.05%

XLU

1D
0.48%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
8.77%
6M
6.26%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMR vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMR
EMR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMR Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMR vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMRXLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

1.27

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

1.73

-0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

2.21

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.40

5.31

-2.91

EMR vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMR and XLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMRXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.27

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.64

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.51

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.41

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between EMR and XLU is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EMR vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than XLU's 2.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
1.64%1.61%1.70%2.14%2.15%2.18%2.49%2.58%3.26%2.76%3.42%3.94%
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
2.58%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Drawdowns

EMR vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and XLU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMRXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-51.98%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.45%

-9.18%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-25.26%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.77%

-36.07%

-14.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.82%

-2.72%

-15.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.12%

-10.26%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.46%

3.82%

+5.64%

Volatility

EMR vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) at 5.09%. This indicates that EMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMRXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.46%

5.09%

+5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.88%

10.36%

+12.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.95%

15.79%

+17.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.63%

17.18%

+9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.84%

19.21%

+9.63%