EMR vs. CW
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMR or CW.
Correlation
The correlation between EMR and CW is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EMR vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EMR:
1.28
CW:
2.62
EMR:
2.03
CW:
3.23
EMR:
1.28
CW:
1.47
EMR:
1.98
CW:
5.55
EMR:
5.39
CW:
20.10
EMR:
6.23%
CW:
3.15%
EMR:
26.14%
CW:
24.19%
EMR:
-56.14%
CW:
-59.19%
EMR:
-7.62%
CW:
-9.00%
Fundamentals
EMR:
$72.95B
CW:
$13.83B
EMR:
$2.83
CW:
$10.59
EMR:
45.26
CW:
34.42
EMR:
2.30
CW:
2.71
EMR:
$17.49B
CW:
$3.08B
EMR:
$5.35B
CW:
$1.14B
EMR:
$4.04B
CW:
$680.05M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a 29.90% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 59.44% return. Over the past 10 years, EMR has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 10.10%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 18.18% annualized return.
EMR
29.90%
-3.88%
15.52%
32.10%
12.85%
10.10%
CW
59.44%
-1.94%
28.96%
62.20%
20.55%
18.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMR vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMR vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than CW's 0.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 1.69% | 2.14% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 3.26% | 2.76% | 3.42% | 3.94% | 2.85% | 2.37% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
EMR vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, smaller than the maximum CW drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMR vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) is 6.45%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that EMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EMR vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emerson Electric Co. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities