EMR vs. CW
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMR or CW.
Correlation
The correlation between EMR and CW is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EMR vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EMR:
0.75
CW:
1.25
EMR:
1.23
CW:
1.65
EMR:
1.16
CW:
1.26
EMR:
1.08
CW:
1.87
EMR:
2.71
CW:
6.74
EMR:
6.78%
CW:
5.20%
EMR:
24.65%
CW:
28.05%
EMR:
-56.14%
CW:
-59.19%
EMR:
-8.91%
CW:
-18.77%
Fundamentals
EMR:
$68.71B
CW:
$11.91B
EMR:
$3.55
CW:
$10.54
EMR:
34.32
CW:
30.00
EMR:
1.62
CW:
2.71
EMR:
$17.55B
CW:
$3.12B
EMR:
$5.66B
CW:
$1.15B
EMR:
$4.61B
CW:
$674.59M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly higher than CW's -10.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EMR has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 10.64%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 16.58% annualized return.
EMR
-1.26%
-5.83%
17.42%
17.82%
13.67%
10.64%
CW
-10.90%
-17.34%
2.13%
32.93%
17.55%
16.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMR vs. CW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EMR
CW
EMR vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMR vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than CW's 0.26% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.14% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 3.26% | 2.76% | 3.42% | 3.94% | 2.85% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.26% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% |
Drawdowns
EMR vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, smaller than the maximum CW drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMR vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) is 6.43%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 14.27%. This indicates that EMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EMR vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emerson Electric Co. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities