EMR vs. CW
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMR or CW.
Key characteristics
| EMR | CW | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.01% | 20.46% |
| 1Y Return | 31.72% | 65.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.75% | 28.63% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.20% | 18.96% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.87% | 15.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.39 | 3.19 |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.64% | 18.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.14% | -59.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.09% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| EMR | CW | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $62.82B | $9.72B |
| EPS | $3.41 | $9.20 |
| PE Ratio | 32.23 | 27.61 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.30 | 2.71 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.91B | $2.85B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $7.43B | $954.61M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $4.31B | $629.67M |
Correlation
The correlation between EMR and CW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EMR vs. CW - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 20.46% return. Over the past 10 years, EMR has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 7.87%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMR vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMR vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than CW's 0.30% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 1.96% | 2.14% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 3.26% | 2.76% | 3.42% | 3.94% | 2.85% | 2.37% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
EMR vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, smaller than the maximum CW drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMR vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) is 3.37%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that EMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EMR vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emerson Electric Co. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities