PortfoliosLab logo
EMM vs. SMIN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EMM and SMIN is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EMM vs. SMIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) and iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EMM:

0.19

SMIN:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

EMM:

0.25

SMIN:

0.47

Omega Ratio

EMM:

1.03

SMIN:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

EMM:

0.08

SMIN:

0.22

Martin Ratio

EMM:

0.20

SMIN:

0.52

Ulcer Index

EMM:

8.52%

SMIN:

10.53%

Daily Std Dev

EMM:

19.08%

SMIN:

22.10%

Max Drawdown

EMM:

-21.99%

SMIN:

-60.50%

Current Drawdown

EMM:

-5.43%

SMIN:

-8.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMM achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly higher than SMIN's -2.37% return.


EMM

YTD

5.22%

1M

6.28%

6M

2.78%

1Y

4.68%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SMIN

YTD

-2.37%

1M

6.77%

6M

-4.15%

1Y

5.62%

3Y*

15.60%

5Y*

25.54%

10Y*

10.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF

EMM vs. SMIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIN's 0.76% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EMM vs. SMIN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMM is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMM is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMM is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMM is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMM is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMM is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SMIN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMIN is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMIN is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMIN is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMIN is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMIN is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMIN is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EMM vs. SMIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) and iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EMM Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is comparable to the SMIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMM and SMIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EMM vs. SMIN - Dividend Comparison

EMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than SMIN's 7.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EMM
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
0.76%0.80%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMIN
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
7.01%6.84%0.41%0.01%1.27%1.07%1.74%1.68%0.89%2.30%0.93%0.34%

Drawdowns

EMM vs. SMIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMM drawdown since its inception was -21.99%, smaller than the maximum SMIN drawdown of -60.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMM and SMIN.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EMM vs. SMIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) is 3.72%, while iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that EMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...