EMM vs. GSLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC).
EMM and GSLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMM is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Sep 24, 2010. GSLC is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. It was launched on Sep 17, 2015.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMM or GSLC.
Correlation
The correlation between EMM and GSLC is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EMM vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EMM:
0.18
GSLC:
1.77
EMM:
0.35
GSLC:
2.39
EMM:
1.04
GSLC:
1.32
EMM:
0.24
GSLC:
2.70
EMM:
0.54
GSLC:
10.26
EMM:
5.47%
GSLC:
2.19%
EMM:
16.28%
GSLC:
12.74%
EMM:
-13.61%
GSLC:
-33.69%
EMM:
-9.28%
GSLC:
-0.94%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMM achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than GSLC's 3.49% return.
EMM
0.94%
1.25%
-2.31%
2.53%
N/A
N/A
GSLC
3.49%
4.32%
14.40%
21.50%
13.43%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMM vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMM vs. GSLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EMM
GSLC
EMM vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMM vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison
EMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than GSLC's 1.07% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 0.79% | 0.80% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.07% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
EMM vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMM drawdown since its inception was -13.61%, smaller than the maximum GSLC drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMM and GSLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMM vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) at 3.55%. This indicates that EMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.