Correlation
The correlation between EMKR and PWR is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
EMKR vs. PWR
Compare and contrast key facts about EMCORE Corporation (EMKR) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMKR or PWR.
Performance
EMKR vs. PWR - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
Fundamentals
EMKR:
$28.11M
PWR:
$50.74B
EMKR:
-$3.09
PWR:
$6.16
EMKR:
1.08
PWR:
2.11
EMKR:
0.35
PWR:
2.04
EMKR:
0.62
PWR:
6.76
EMKR:
$61.44M
PWR:
$24.87B
EMKR:
$15.75M
PWR:
$3.53B
EMKR:
-$15.61M
PWR:
$2.24B
Returns By Period
EMKR
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
PWR
7.57%
16.20%
-1.15%
22.39%
40.35%
56.22%
27.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMKR vs. PWR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EMKR
PWR
EMKR vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMCORE Corporation (EMKR) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
EMKR vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison
EMKR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMKR EMCORE Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.24% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMKR vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading data...
Volatility
EMKR vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...
Financials
EMKR vs. PWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EMCORE Corporation and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EMKR vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison
EMKR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EMCORE Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.27M and revenue of 19.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 834.04M and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.4%.
EMKR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EMCORE Corporation reported an operating income of -5.46M and revenue of 19.31M, resulting in an operating margin of -28.3%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 239.08M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
EMKR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EMCORE Corporation reported a net income of -5.51M and revenue of 19.31M, resulting in a net margin of -28.6%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 144.26M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.