Correlation
The correlation between EMKR and CTAS is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
EMKR vs. CTAS
Compare and contrast key facts about EMCORE Corporation (EMKR) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMKR or CTAS.
Performance
EMKR vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
Fundamentals
EMKR:
$28.11M
CTAS:
$91.21B
EMKR:
-$3.09
CTAS:
$4.30
EMKR:
1.08
CTAS:
4.03
EMKR:
0.35
CTAS:
8.99
EMKR:
0.62
CTAS:
19.86
EMKR:
$61.44M
CTAS:
$10.14B
EMKR:
$15.75M
CTAS:
$5.02B
EMKR:
-$15.61M
CTAS:
$2.84B
Returns By Period
EMKR
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CTAS
23.47%
7.60%
0.69%
36.52%
32.53%
30.68%
27.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMKR vs. CTAS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EMKR
CTAS
EMKR vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMCORE Corporation (EMKR) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
EMKR vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
EMKR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMKR EMCORE Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 0.69% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% | 2.17% |
Drawdowns
EMKR vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading data...
Volatility
EMKR vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...
Financials
EMKR vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EMCORE Corporation and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EMKR vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison
EMKR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EMCORE Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.27M and revenue of 19.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 2.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.
EMKR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EMCORE Corporation reported an operating income of -5.46M and revenue of 19.31M, resulting in an operating margin of -28.3%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 609.85M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.
EMKR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EMCORE Corporation reported a net income of -5.51M and revenue of 19.31M, resulting in a net margin of -28.6%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 463.50M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in a net margin of 17.8%.