EME vs. RS
EME (EMCOR Group, Inc.) and RS (Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.) are both stocks. EME operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while RS operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, EME returned 31.16%/yr vs 20.78%/yr for RS. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EME vs. RS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EME achieves a 34.23% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 44.71% return. Over the past 10 years, EME has outperformed RS with an annualized return of 31.16%, while RS has yielded a comparatively lower 20.78% annualized return.
EME
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- YTD
- 34.23%
- 1Y
- 30.56%
- 3Y*
- 56.15%
- 5Y*
- 47.20%
- 10Y*
- 31.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.32%
RS
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 24.38%
- YTD
- 44.71%
- 1Y
- 48.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.32%
- 5Y*
- 24.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $396.49M | $378.74M | $358.60M | |
| $150.92M | $129.82M | $138.21M |
EME vs. RS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 34.23% | 35.05% | 111.27% | 46.03% | 16.81% | 39.93% | 6.47% | 45.18% | -26.68% | 16.09% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 44.71% | 9.12% | -2.33% | 40.29% | 27.08% | 37.84% | 2.42% | 72.21% | -15.12% | 10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between EME and RS is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 1995 | 0.43 |
The correlation between EME and RS shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.50 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EME:
$36.16B
RS:
$21.18B
EME:
$42.53
RS:
$17.15
EME:
19.28
RS:
24.20
EME:
1.49
RS:
1.37
EME:
$18.60B
RS:
$15.81B
EME:
$3.66B
RS:
$1.92B
EME:
$2.18B
RS:
$1.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EME vs. RS — Risk / Return Rank
EME
RS
EME vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EME | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.35 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 2.54 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | 6.74 | -4.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EME vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EME drawdown since its inception was -70.56%, smaller than the maximum RS drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EME and RS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EME | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.56% | -83.80% | +13.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.71% | -19.05% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.19% | -22.30% | -13.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.19% | -22.32% | -13.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.00% | -40.83% | -7.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.08% | 0.00% | -13.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.37% | -16.42% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.97% | 7.16% | +4.81% |
Volatility
EME vs. RS - Volatility Comparison
EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) has a higher volatility of 20.73% compared to Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) at 7.13%. This indicates that EME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EME | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.73% | 7.13% | +13.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.43% | 18.97% | +14.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.14% | 23.47% | +20.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.89% | 27.89% | +7.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 29.60% | +4.18% |
Dividends
EME vs. RS - Dividend Comparison
EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than RS's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 0.18% | 0.16% | 0.20% | 0.32% | 0.36% | 0.41% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.67% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.18% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% |
Financials
EME vs. RS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EMCOR Group, Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EME vs. RS - Profitability Comparison
EME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 5.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.
RS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of -1.10B and revenue of 4.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -23.8%.
EME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 547.34M and revenue of 5.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
RS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 441.60M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.
EME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 403.69M and revenue of 5.15B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
RS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 322.90M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EME and RS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EME has higher volatility (20.73%) compared to RS (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EME dropped -70.56% vs RS's -83.80%.
RS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EME and RS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer