PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EME vs. GEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EME vs. GEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Greif, Inc. (GEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EME achieves a 38.34% return, which is significantly higher than GEF's -5.57% return. Over the past 10 years, EME has outperformed GEF with an annualized return of 33.72%, while GEF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.10% annualized return.


EME

1D
0.70%
1M
-9.41%
YTD
38.34%
6M
33.21%
1Y
75.50%
3Y*
71.02%
5Y*
46.50%
10Y*
33.72%

GEF

1D
0.46%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
-5.57%
6M
-1.35%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
9.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EME vs. GEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
38.34%35.05%111.27%46.03%16.81%39.93%6.47%45.18%-26.68%16.09%
GEF
Greif, Inc.
-5.57%14.75%-3.63%0.91%14.49%32.59%11.61%24.52%-36.67%21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between EME and GEF is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 1996

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between EME and GEF has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EME:

$38.09B

GEF:

$3.61B

EPS

EME:

$29.65

GEF:

$17.56

PE Ratio

EME:

28.51

GEF:

3.61

PEG Ratio

EME:

0.67

GEF:

0.08

PS Ratio

EME:

2.14

GEF:

1.05

PB Ratio

EME:

9.85

GEF:

1.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

EME:

$17.75B

GEF:

$3.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EME:

$3.47B

GEF:

$756.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

EME:

$2.03B

GEF:

$509.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EME vs. GEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EME
EME Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GEF
GEF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EME vs. GEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Greif, Inc. (GEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMEGEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.15

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

0.98

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.61

1.93

+5.68

EME vs. GEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EME Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the GEF Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EME and GEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMEGEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

0.66

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.41

0.15

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.26

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.22

+0.38

Drawdowns

EME vs. GEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EME drawdown since its inception was -70.56%, which is greater than GEF's maximum drawdown of -62.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EME and GEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMEGEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.56%

-62.66%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.15%

-19.51%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.19%

-31.09%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

-31.09%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

-57.84%

+9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.42%

-16.78%

+6.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.37%

-18.55%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.96%

9.93%

+0.03%

Volatility

EME vs. GEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) is 6.73%, while Greif, Inc. (GEF) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that EME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMEGEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

7.13%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.45%

16.98%

+8.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.87%

29.07%

+8.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.26%

28.79%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.94%

35.59%

-2.65%

Dividends

EME vs. GEF - Dividend Comparison

EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than GEF's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.15%0.16%0.20%0.32%0.36%0.41%0.35%0.37%0.54%0.39%0.45%0.67%
GEF
Greif, Inc.
3.50%3.25%3.47%3.11%2.86%2.98%3.75%3.98%4.63%2.77%3.27%5.45%

Financials

EME vs. GEF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EMCOR Group, Inc. and Greif, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.63B
1.07B
(EME) Total Revenue
(GEF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EME vs. GEF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EMCOR Group, Inc. and Greif, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
18.7%
23.0%
Portfolio components
EME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 863.95M and revenue of 4.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.7%.

GEF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Greif, Inc. reported a gross profit of 247.00M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.0%.

EME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 403.85M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

GEF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Greif, Inc. reported an operating income of 55.30M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.

EME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 305.48M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

GEF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Greif, Inc. reported a net income of 12.60M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EME and GEF have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEF has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to EME (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EME dropped -70.56% vs GEF's -62.66%.

EME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EME and GEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer