EMBD vs. EPI
EMBD (Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF) and EPI (WisdomTree India Earnings Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EMBD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while EPI is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree India Earnings Index. EMBD is actively managed, while EPI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMBD returned 2.87%/yr vs 5.37%/yr for EPI. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMBD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for EPI.
Performance
EMBD vs. EPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMBD achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than EPI's -10.02% return.
EMBD
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 10.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
EPI
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -10.02%
- 6M
- -8.12%
- 1Y
- -9.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
EMBD vs. EPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.27% | 12.55% | 6.76% | 10.60% | -13.84% | -1.84% | 11.53% |
EPI WisdomTree India Earnings Fund | -10.02% | 2.25% | 10.70% | 26.03% | -4.74% | 26.41% | 49.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMBD and EPI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.31 |
The correlation between EMBD and EPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EMBD vs. EPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMBD
EPI
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EMBD
EPI
Basic Materials
EMBD
-
EPI
Communication Services
EMBD
-
EPI
Consumer Cyclical
EMBD
-
EPI
Consumer Defensive
EMBD
-
EPI
Energy
EMBD
-
EPI
Healthcare
EMBD
-
EPI
Industrials
EMBD
-
EPI
Real Estate
EMBD
-
EPI
Technology
EMBD
-
EPI
Utilities
EMBD
-
EPI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMBD vs. EPI — Risk / Return Rank
EMBD
EPI
EMBD vs. EPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMBD | EPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.90 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | -0.57 | +3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.52 | -1.39 | +10.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMBD | EPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | -0.64 | +2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.33 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.13 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
EMBD vs. EPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMBD drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, smaller than the maximum EPI drawdown of -66.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBD and EPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMBD | EPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.27% | -66.21% | +41.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.23% | -16.88% | +12.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.03% | -21.89% | +14.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.27% | -21.89% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -17.83% | +17.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -18.65% | +12.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 6.87% | -5.78% |
Volatility
EMBD vs. EPI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) is 1.62%, while WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that EMBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMBD | EPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 4.86% | -3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.16% | 12.80% | -8.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 14.94% | -8.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.17% | 16.21% | -7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.89% | 20.35% | -11.46% |
EMBD vs. EPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMBD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EPI's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMBD vs. EPI - Dividend Comparison
EMBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, while EPI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.69% | 5.48% | 5.83% | 5.29% | 4.53% | 4.99% | 3.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EPI WisdomTree India Earnings Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 0.15% | 6.01% | 1.18% | 0.78% | 1.17% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 1.05% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMBD and EPI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPI has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to EMBD (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMBD dropped -24.27% vs EPI's -66.21%.
On 5-year performance, EPI leads with 5.37% vs 2.87% for EMBD. On fees, EMBD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EMBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EPI has performed better with a 5.37% return vs 2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMBD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPI.
EMBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.69%, compared with 0.00% for EPI.
EMBD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while EPI is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMBD and 0.84% for EPI.
EMBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMBD and EPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer