PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELAN vs. ZTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ELAN vs. ZTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Elanco Animal Health Incorporated (ELAN) and Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELAN achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly higher than ZTS's -38.76% return.


ELAN

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.98%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.07%
1Y
76.08%
3Y*
36.85%
5Y*
-7.56%
10Y*

ZTS

1D
-1.51%
1M
-33.09%
YTD
-38.76%
6M
-38.08%
1Y
-54.21%
3Y*
-22.76%
5Y*
-14.30%
10Y*
5.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELAN vs. ZTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ELAN
Elanco Animal Health Incorporated
4.42%86.87%-18.72%21.93%-56.94%-7.47%4.14%-6.60%-12.42%
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.
-38.76%-21.75%-16.63%35.91%-39.51%48.26%25.76%55.71%-4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ELAN and ZTS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2018

0.45

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ELAN:

$11.96B

ZTS:

$32.27B

EPS

ELAN:

-$0.48

ZTS:

$6.04

PS Ratio

ELAN:

2.41

ZTS:

3.51

PB Ratio

ELAN:

1.84

ZTS:

9.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

ELAN:

$4.89B

ZTS:

$9.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ELAN:

$2.42B

ZTS:

$6.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

ELAN:

$755.00M

ZTS:

$3.95B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELAN vs. ZTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELAN
ELAN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ELAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ELAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTS
ZTS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ZTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTS Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELAN vs. ZTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated (ELAN) and Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELANZTSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.78

-1.53

+3.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

-2.24

+4.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.64

+0.69

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

-0.97

+3.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.56

-2.13

+11.69

ELAN vs. ZTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the ZTS Sharpe Ratio of -1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELAN and ZTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELANZTSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

-1.53

+3.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

-0.50

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.30

-0.42

Drawdowns

ELAN vs. ZTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELAN drawdown since its inception was -78.00%, which is greater than ZTS's maximum drawdown of -68.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELAN and ZTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELANZTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.00%

-68.48%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.23%

-55.74%

+29.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.10%

-61.77%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.00%

-68.48%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.65%

-67.55%

+31.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.82%

-14.73%

-25.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.93%

25.41%

-17.48%

Volatility

ELAN vs. ZTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated (ELAN) is 22.38%, while Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) has a volatility of 26.16%. This indicates that ELAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELANZTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.38%

26.16%

-3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.54%

31.12%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.96%

35.43%

+7.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.54%

28.71%

+16.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.19%

27.07%

+17.12%

Dividends

ELAN vs. ZTS - Dividend Comparison

ELAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ELAN
Elanco Animal Health Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.
2.70%1.59%1.06%0.76%0.89%0.41%0.48%0.50%0.59%0.58%0.71%0.69%

Financials

ELAN vs. ZTS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Elanco Animal Health Incorporated and Zoetis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.37B
2.26B
(ELAN) Total Revenue
(ZTS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ELAN vs. ZTS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Elanco Animal Health Incorporated and Zoetis Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
57.3%
71.7%
Portfolio components
ELAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elanco Animal Health Incorporated reported a gross profit of 785.00M and revenue of 1.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.3%.

ZTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

ELAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elanco Animal Health Incorporated reported an operating income of 307.00M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.

ZTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported an operating income of 853.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.

ELAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elanco Animal Health Incorporated reported a net income of 57.00M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

ZTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported a net income of 601.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ELAN and ZTS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTS has higher volatility (26.16%) compared to ELAN (22.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELAN dropped -78.00% vs ZTS's -68.48%.

ELAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELAN and ZTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer