PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIS vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIS vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIS achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 68.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EIS has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 11.97%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.90% annualized return.


EIS

1D
-1.92%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
18.19%
6M
22.47%
1Y
54.91%
3Y*
37.61%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
11.97%

EWT

1D
-0.20%
1M
18.24%
YTD
68.27%
6M
72.42%
1Y
110.37%
3Y*
38.34%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
19.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIS vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIS
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
18.19%45.11%34.50%5.48%-27.05%22.83%12.01%20.93%-4.84%12.77%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
68.27%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EIS and EWT is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.56

The correlation between EIS and EWT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

EIS vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIS
EWT

Financial Services

34.6%
13.0%

Technology

17.8%
72.9%

Industrials

10.9%
4.9%

Healthcare

9.8%
0.8%

Real Estate

9.1%

-

Utilities

6.6%

-

Communication Services

2.7%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
1.1%

Energy

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.5%

Financial Services

EIS
34.6%
EWT
13.0%

Technology

EIS
17.8%
EWT
72.9%

Industrials

EIS
10.9%
EWT
4.9%

Healthcare

EIS
9.8%
EWT
0.8%

Real Estate

EIS
9.1%
EWT

-

Utilities

EIS
6.6%
EWT

-

Communication Services

EIS
2.7%
EWT
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EIS
2.5%
EWT
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

EIS
2.3%
EWT
1.1%

Energy

EIS
2.0%
EWT

-

Basic Materials

EIS
1.8%
EWT
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIS vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIS
EIS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIS vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EISEWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.69

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

10.56

-6.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.54

32.40

-15.85

EIS vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIS Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 4.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIS and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EISEWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

4.42

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.82

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.92

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.26

+0.07

Drawdowns

EIS vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIS drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIS and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EISEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.94%

-64.37%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.40%

-10.51%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-25.66%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.88%

-38.88%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.88%

-38.88%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-0.20%

-5.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-19.23%

+5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

3.42%

-0.09%

Volatility

EIS vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) is 6.64%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that EIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EISEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

10.43%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.05%

20.52%

-4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.56%

25.10%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.81%

22.59%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

21.60%

-0.52%

EIS vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EIS and EWT have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

EIS vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

EIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than EWT's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIS
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
1.22%1.44%1.38%1.39%1.66%1.04%0.16%2.06%0.87%2.02%1.78%2.55%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.63%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIS and EWT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to EIS (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIS dropped -51.94% vs EWT's -64.37%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.90% vs 11.97% for EIS. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.90% return vs 11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EIS and EWT have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 1.22% for EIS.

EIS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. EIS tracks MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net), while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.42 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIS and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer