PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIRL vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIRL vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIRL achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 54.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EIRL has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 9.76%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.92% annualized return.


EIRL

1D
0.12%
1M
0.25%
6M
6.83%
YTD
10.04%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
9.76%
ALL TIME*
9.90%

EWT

1D
1.48%
1M
-6.56%
6M
42.12%
YTD
54.23%
1Y
75.51%
3Y*
36.58%
5Y*
16.78%
10Y*
17.92%
ALL TIME*
7.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$628.14K$449.36K$1.15M
$570.84M$674.34M$671.50M

EIRL vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
10.04%28.82%-1.64%35.13%-18.83%13.72%9.63%28.15%-21.92%29.82%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
54.23%28.38%16.11%29.00%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EIRL and EWT is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2010

0.49

The correlation between EIRL and EWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EIRL vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIRL
EWT

Financial Services

39.6%
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

19.5%
1.1%

Healthcare

10.9%
1.3%

Industrials

10.4%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
0.4%

Basic Materials

4.3%
3.9%

Energy

4.3%

-

Utilities

4.3%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

0.2%
71.6%

Communication Services

0.0%
1.8%

Financial Services

EIRL
39.6%
EWT
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

EIRL
19.5%
EWT
1.1%

Healthcare

EIRL
10.9%
EWT
1.3%

Industrials

EIRL
10.4%
EWT
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EIRL
8.5%
EWT
0.4%

Basic Materials

EIRL
4.3%
EWT
3.9%

Energy

EIRL
4.3%
EWT

-

Utilities

EIRL
4.3%
EWT

-

Real Estate

EIRL
2.0%
EWT

-

Technology

EIRL
0.2%
EWT
71.6%

Communication Services

EIRL
0.0%
EWT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIRL vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EIRL
EIRL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EIRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRL Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EIRL vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIRLEWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.83

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

15.47

-9.42

EIRL vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIRL Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIRL and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIRL vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIRL drawdown since its inception was -46.48%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRL and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIRLEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.48%

-64.37%

+17.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.28%

-19.83%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

-25.66%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.14%

-38.88%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.48%

-38.88%

-7.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-12.15%

+11.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-19.09%

+10.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

4.90%

-0.64%

Volatility

EIRL vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) is 4.26%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 13.53%. This indicates that EIRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIRLEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

13.53%

-9.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

27.44%

-12.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

30.86%

-12.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

23.96%

-2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

22.20%

-1.00%

EIRL vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIRL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIRL vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

EIRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than EWT's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
2.37%2.71%2.56%1.00%1.13%0.82%0.50%2.11%1.52%1.44%1.34%1.70%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.87%4.43%3.32%12.01%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIRL and EWT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to EIRL (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRL dropped -46.48% vs EWT's -64.37%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 17.92% vs 9.76% for EIRL. On fees, EIRL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EIRL has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 17.92% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EIRL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.37% for EIRL.

EIRL is categorized as Europe Equities, while EWT is Taiwan Equities. EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EIRL and 0.59% for EWT.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIRL and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer