EIRL vs. EWT
EIRL (iShares MSCI Ireland ETF) and EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EIRL is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while EWT is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIRL returned 8.09%/yr vs 19.90%/yr for EWT. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIRL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWT.
Performance
EIRL vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIRL achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 68.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EIRL has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 8.09%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.90% annualized return.
EIRL
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 19.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
EWT
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 18.24%
- YTD
- 68.27%
- 6M
- 72.42%
- 1Y
- 110.37%
- 3Y*
- 38.34%
- 5Y*
- 18.33%
- 10Y*
- 19.90%
EIRL vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | 3.82% | 28.82% | -1.64% | 35.13% | -18.83% | 13.72% | 9.63% | 28.15% | -21.92% | 29.82% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 68.27% | 28.38% | 16.11% | 23.97% | -28.90% | 26.18% | 31.50% | 33.36% | -9.90% | 26.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIRL and EWT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2010 | 0.50 |
The correlation between EIRL and EWT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
EIRL vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EIRL
EWT
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
EIRL
EWT
Industrials
EIRL
EWT
Consumer Defensive
EIRL
EWT
Healthcare
EIRL
EWT
Consumer Cyclical
EIRL
EWT
Energy
EIRL
EWT
-
Real Estate
EIRL
EWT
-
Basic Materials
EIRL
EWT
Technology
EIRL
EWT
Communication Services
EIRL
-
EWT
Utilities
EIRL
-
EWT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIRL vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank
EIRL
EWT
EIRL vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIRL | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.69 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 10.56 | -9.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 32.40 | -27.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIRL | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 4.42 | -3.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.82 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.92 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.26 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
EIRL vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIRL drawdown since its inception was -46.48%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRL and EWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIRL | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.48% | -64.37% | +17.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.28% | -10.51% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.04% | -25.66% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.14% | -38.88% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.48% | -38.88% | -7.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.20% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -19.23% | +10.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 3.42% | +0.93% |
Volatility
EIRL vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) is 5.72%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that EIRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIRL | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 10.43% | -4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | 20.52% | -5.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 25.10% | -7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 22.59% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 21.60% | +0.16% |
EIRL vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIRL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIRL vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
EIRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, which matches EWT's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | 2.61% | 2.71% | 2.56% | 1.00% | 1.13% | 0.82% | 0.50% | 2.11% | 1.52% | 1.44% | 1.34% | 1.70% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.63% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 8.12% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIRL and EWT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to EIRL (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRL dropped -46.48% vs EWT's -64.37%.
On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.90% vs 8.09% for EIRL. On fees, EIRL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EIRL has been the lower-risk option at 5.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.90% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIRL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.
EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 2.61% for EIRL.
EIRL is categorized as Europe Equities, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EIRL and 0.59% for EWT.
EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.42 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIRL and EWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer