EINC vs. JEPQ
EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EINC returned 29.18%/yr vs 20.92%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EINC charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
EINC vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 9.54% return.
EINC
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 24.40%
- 1Y
- 26.00%
- 3Y*
- 29.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 24.74% | 7.11% | 42.79% | 15.55% | -5.33% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 9.54% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between EINC and JEPQ is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.29 |
The correlation between EINC and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EINC vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EINC
JEPQ
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
EINC
JEPQ
Industrials
EINC
JEPQ
Utilities
EINC
JEPQ
Basic Materials
EINC
-
JEPQ
Communication Services
EINC
-
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
EINC
-
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
EINC
-
JEPQ
Financial Services
EINC
-
JEPQ
Healthcare
EINC
-
JEPQ
Real Estate
EINC
-
JEPQ
Technology
EINC
-
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EINC vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
EINC
JEPQ
EINC vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EINC | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.49 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 3.31 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 16.22 | -7.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EINC | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.49 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 1.00 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
EINC vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EINC | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.55% | -20.07% | -67.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -8.82% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.01% | -20.07% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -0.10% | -5.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.29% | -3.42% | -40.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 1.79% | +1.06% |
Volatility
EINC vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 1.26%. This indicates that EINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EINC | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 1.26% | +5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 9.07% | +2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 11.73% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 16.61% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 16.61% | +8.82% |
EINC vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EINC vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than JEPQ's 10.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.55% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.07% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EINC and JEPQ have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EINC has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to JEPQ (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EINC dropped -87.55% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, EINC leads with 29.18% vs 20.92% for JEPQ. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EINC has performed better with a 29.18% return vs 20.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 3.55% for EINC.
EINC is categorized as Energy Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EINC and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer