EINC vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
EINC and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EINC is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Mar 13, 2012. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Blackrock Financial Management that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both EINC and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EINC or CSPX.L.
Key characteristics
| EINC | CSPX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 44.95% | 26.77% |
| 1Y Return | 52.40% | 39.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 23.76% | 10.12% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 17.95% | 15.74% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -1.58% | 13.08% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.98 | 3.27 |
| Sortino Ratio | 5.30 | 4.52 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.69 | 1.62 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.04 | 4.93 |
| Martin Ratio | 31.23 | 21.21 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.69% | 1.78% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.34% | 11.56% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.56% | -33.90% |
| Current Drawdown | -25.52% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EINC and CSPX.L is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EINC vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 44.95% return, which is significantly higher than CSPX.L's 26.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EINC has underperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of -1.58%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EINC vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EINC vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EINC vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, while CSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.28% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% | 12.41% | 8.90% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EINC vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.56%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and CSPX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EINC vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 3.75%. This indicates that EINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.