PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EIFAX vs. HYLS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


EIFAXHYLS
YTD Return7.43%5.52%
1Y Return11.07%11.99%
3Y Return (Ann)6.21%1.68%
5Y Return (Ann)5.65%3.13%
10Y Return (Ann)5.01%3.74%
Sharpe Ratio3.692.67
Sortino Ratio10.794.05
Omega Ratio3.201.55
Calmar Ratio13.851.69
Martin Ratio62.3116.58
Ulcer Index0.18%0.72%
Daily Std Dev3.00%4.44%
Max Drawdown-38.15%-22.99%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.48%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between EIFAX and HYLS is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

EIFAX vs. HYLS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EIFAX achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than HYLS's 5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFAX has outperformed HYLS with an annualized return of 5.01%, while HYLS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.74% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.15%
5.25%
EIFAX
HYLS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EIFAX vs. HYLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIFAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLS's 1.01% expense ratio.


HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
Expense ratio chart for HYLS: current value at 1.01% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.01%
Expense ratio chart for EIFAX: current value at 0.47% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.47%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EIFAX vs. HYLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) and First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIFAX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EIFAX, currently valued at 3.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.69
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EIFAX, currently valued at 10.79, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0010.79
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EIFAX, currently valued at 3.20, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.003.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EIFAX, currently valued at 13.85, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0013.85
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EIFAX, currently valued at 62.31, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0062.31
HYLS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HYLS, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.67
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HYLS, currently valued at 4.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HYLS, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HYLS, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HYLS, currently valued at 16.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0016.58

EIFAX vs. HYLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.69, which is higher than the HYLS Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFAX and HYLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.69
2.67
EIFAX
HYLS

Dividends

EIFAX vs. HYLS - Dividend Comparison

EIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.47%, more than HYLS's 6.24% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
9.47%9.33%5.92%4.03%4.52%5.58%5.10%4.46%5.03%5.29%4.79%4.82%
HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
6.24%5.98%7.38%5.48%5.09%5.17%5.81%5.53%5.37%6.11%5.78%5.10%

Drawdowns

EIFAX vs. HYLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFAX drawdown since its inception was -38.15%, which is greater than HYLS's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFAX and HYLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-0.48%
EIFAX
HYLS

Volatility

EIFAX vs. HYLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) is 0.63%, while First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) has a volatility of 0.79%. This indicates that EIFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.63%
0.79%
EIFAX
HYLS