PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIDO vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIDO vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIDO achieves a -34.87% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, EIDO has underperformed VT with an annualized return of -3.97%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


EIDO

1D
-4.99%
1M
-17.26%
YTD
-34.87%
6M
-34.69%
1Y
-31.45%
3Y*
-16.90%
5Y*
-8.84%
10Y*
-3.97%

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIDO vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIDO
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF
-34.87%4.90%-13.02%2.56%-0.16%-0.60%-7.13%5.30%-10.88%19.40%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EIDO and VT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between EIDO and VT has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EIDO vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIDO
VT

Financial Services

37.8%
15.9%

Basic Materials

18.5%
4.2%

Energy

10.6%
4.3%

Communication Services

8.7%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
4.8%

Industrials

6.1%
12.0%

Technology

2.7%
27.8%

Utilities

2.4%
2.7%

Healthcare

2.4%
8.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
9.5%

Financial Services

EIDO
37.8%
VT
15.9%

Basic Materials

EIDO
18.5%
VT
4.2%

Energy

EIDO
10.6%
VT
4.3%

Communication Services

EIDO
8.7%
VT
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

EIDO
7.5%
VT
4.8%

Industrials

EIDO
6.1%
VT
12.0%

Technology

EIDO
2.7%
VT
27.8%

Utilities

EIDO
2.4%
VT
2.7%

Healthcare

EIDO
2.4%
VT
8.1%

Real Estate

EIDO
1.8%
VT
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EIDO
1.6%
VT
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIDO vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIDO
EIDO Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EIDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIDO Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EIDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIDO Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIDO vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIDOVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.42

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

3.04

-3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.63

13.53

-16.16

EIDO vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIDO Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIDO and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIDOVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.41

2.31

-3.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.69

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.74

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.44

-0.50

Drawdowns

EIDO vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIDO drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIDO and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIDOVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.21%

-50.27%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.63%

-9.67%

-26.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.60%

-16.51%

-29.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.60%

-26.38%

-19.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.41%

-34.24%

-25.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.54%

-0.88%

-54.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.63%

-7.02%

-17.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.98%

2.17%

+9.81%

Volatility

EIDO vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that EIDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIDOVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

3.83%

+3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.22%

10.17%

+8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

12.70%

+9.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

16.05%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

17.23%

+7.54%

EIDO vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIDO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIDO vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

EIDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIDO
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF
5.46%3.56%5.20%2.94%2.53%1.33%1.51%1.78%1.99%1.26%1.16%1.67%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIDO and VT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIDO has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIDO dropped -63.21% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.74% vs -3.97% for EIDO. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.74% return vs -3.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EIDO.

EIDO has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

EIDO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VT is Global Equities. EIDO tracks MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIDO and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIDO and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer