PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EHC vs. ^SP500TR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EHC vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHC achieves a -5.52% return, which is significantly lower than ^SP500TR's 8.22% return.


EHC

1D
1.24%
1M
-4.82%
YTD
-5.52%
6M
-6.49%
1Y
-16.35%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*

^SP500TR

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.22%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
15.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHC vs. ^SP500TR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EHC
Encompass Health Corporation
-5.52%15.67%39.17%12.62%16.77%-19.90%21.42%14.26%26.89%0.20%
^SP500TR
S&P 500 Total Return
8.22%17.88%25.02%26.29%-18.11%28.71%18.40%31.49%-4.38%-0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between EHC and ^SP500TR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between EHC and ^SP500TR has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EHC vs. ^SP500TR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHC
EHC Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHC Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
EHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHC Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP500TR
^SP500TR Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHC vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EHC^SP500TRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.34

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

2.68

-3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

12.05

-13.19

EHC vs. ^SP500TR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHC and ^SP500TR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EHC vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHC drawdown since its inception was -39.54%, smaller than the maximum ^SP500TR drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHC and ^SP500TR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EHC^SP500TRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.54%

-55.25%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.09%

-8.89%

-17.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.09%

-18.75%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.10%

-24.49%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.15%

-3.13%

-18.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-8.16%

-3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.29%

1.97%

+12.32%

Volatility

EHC vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison

Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) at 4.90%. This indicates that EHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP500TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EHC^SP500TRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.64%

4.90%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.87%

9.93%

+10.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.21%

12.57%

+14.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.08%

17.00%

+9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.28%

18.08%

+10.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


EHC and ^SP500TR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EHC has higher volatility (8.64%) compared to ^SP500TR (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHC dropped -39.54% vs ^SP500TR's -55.25%.

^SP500TR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EHC and ^SP500TR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer