PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGUS vs. BAFWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGUS vs. BAFWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGUS achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly higher than BAFWX's 7.08% return.


EGUS

1D
-1.06%
1M
8.21%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.25%
1Y
32.26%
3Y*
26.92%
5Y*
10Y*

BAFWX

1D
-0.16%
1M
9.41%
YTD
7.08%
6M
6.03%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
15.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGUS vs. BAFWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EGUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF
12.08%19.02%32.85%27.00%
BAFWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares
7.08%3.35%20.35%20.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EGUS and BAFWX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.91

The correlation between EGUS and BAFWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGUS vs. BAFWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGUS
EGUS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BAFWX
BAFWX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BAFWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAFWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAFWX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BAFWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAFWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGUS vs. BAFWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EGUSBAFWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.12

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

0.54

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

1.41

+5.62

EGUS vs. BAFWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the BAFWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGUS and BAFWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EGUSBAFWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

0.65

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

0.80

+0.65

Drawdowns

EGUS vs. BAFWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGUS drawdown since its inception was -24.87%, smaller than the maximum BAFWX drawdown of -36.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGUS and BAFWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGUSBAFWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.87%

-36.86%

+11.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.66%

-19.93%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-25.03%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.16%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-5.71%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

7.64%

-3.04%

Volatility

EGUS vs. BAFWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) is 3.98%, while Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that EGUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAFWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGUSBAFWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

4.49%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

13.16%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.34%

16.55%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

22.62%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.15%

21.51%

-2.36%

EGUS vs. BAFWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BAFWX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

EGUS vs. BAFWX - Dividend Comparison

EGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than BAFWX's 22.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAFWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares
22.26%23.83%5.23%0.01%0.00%1.82%0.00%1.48%3.71%1.70%0.71%4.73%
EGUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF
0.19%0.22%0.25%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EGUS and BAFWX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAFWX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to EGUS (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGUS dropped -24.87% vs BAFWX's -36.86%.

EGUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGUS and BAFWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer