PortfoliosLab logo
EGO vs. NEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EGO and NEM is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EGO vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EGO:

0.71

NEM:

0.80

Sortino Ratio

EGO:

1.21

NEM:

1.34

Omega Ratio

EGO:

1.16

NEM:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

EGO:

0.36

NEM:

0.64

Martin Ratio

EGO:

2.55

NEM:

1.85

Ulcer Index

EGO:

12.42%

NEM:

17.97%

Daily Std Dev

EGO:

43.21%

NEM:

36.49%

Max Drawdown

EGO:

-97.49%

NEM:

-77.55%

Current Drawdown

EGO:

-81.32%

NEM:

-29.92%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EGO:

$4.07B

NEM:

$60.08B

EPS

EGO:

$1.64

NEM:

$4.39

PE Ratio

EGO:

11.99

NEM:

12.30

PEG Ratio

EGO:

10.65

NEM:

0.79

PS Ratio

EGO:

2.86

NEM:

3.05

PB Ratio

EGO:

1.03

NEM:

1.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

EGO:

$1.42B

NEM:

$19.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EGO:

$619.30M

NEM:

$7.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

EGO:

$705.65M

NEM:

$9.78B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGO achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 45.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EGO has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of -2.67%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.63% annualized return.


EGO

YTD

32.28%

1M

9.28%

6M

18.14%

1Y

28.56%

5Y*

17.19%

10Y*

-2.67%

NEM

YTD

45.89%

1M

5.97%

6M

21.28%

1Y

29.96%

5Y*

0.16%

10Y*

9.63%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EGO vs. NEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EGO is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EGO is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EGO is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EGO is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EGO is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EGO is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NEM is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NEM is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NEM is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NEM is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NEM is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NEM is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EGO vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGO and NEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EGO vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

EGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EGO
Eldorado Gold Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.05%0.00%0.54%0.30%
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
1.85%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%1.19%

Drawdowns

EGO vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGO drawdown since its inception was -97.49%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -77.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGO and NEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EGO vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) has a higher volatility of 13.92% compared to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) at 12.92%. This indicates that EGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EGO vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eldorado Gold Corporation and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
355.25M
5.01B
(EGO) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EGO vs. NEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Eldorado Gold Corporation and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
41.3%
46.1%
(EGO) Gross Margin
(NEM) Gross Margin
EGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eldorado Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 146.77M and revenue of 355.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.3%.

NEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.31B and revenue of 5.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.1%.

EGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eldorado Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 114.23M and revenue of 355.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.2%.

NEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported an operating income of 2.02B and revenue of 5.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.2%.

EGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eldorado Gold Corporation reported a net income of 72.40M and revenue of 355.25M, resulting in a net margin of 20.4%.

NEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported a net income of 1.89B and revenue of 5.01B, resulting in a net margin of 37.7%.