EGO vs. LUG.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EGO or LUG.TO.
Key characteristics
| EGO | LUG.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.43% | 88.39% |
| 1Y Return | 43.42% | 102.18% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 14.66% | 39.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.01% | 34.96% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -6.72% | 21.33% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.27 | 2.87 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.74 | 3.32 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.23 | 1.42 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.55 | 1.79 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.21 | 20.20 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.94% | 5.27% |
| Daily Std Dev | 38.84% | 37.12% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.49% | -97.92% |
| Current Drawdown | -85.42% | -13.10% |
Fundamentals
| EGO | LUG.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.19B | CA$7.40B |
| EPS | $1.39 | CA$1.76 |
| PE Ratio | 11.06 | 17.31 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.20B | CA$718.86M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $375.53M | CA$363.05M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $618.71M | CA$389.06M |
Correlation
The correlation between EGO and LUG.TO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EGO vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EGO achieves a 18.43% return, which is significantly lower than LUG.TO's 88.39% return. Over the past 10 years, EGO has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of -6.72%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.33% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EGO vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EGO vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison
EGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGO Eldorado Gold Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.05% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.30% | 2.07% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 2.23% | 3.27% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EGO vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGO drawdown since its inception was -97.49%, roughly equal to the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGO and LUG.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EGO vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) has a higher volatility of 12.93% compared to Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) at 11.86%. This indicates that EGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EGO vs. LUG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eldorado Gold Corporation and Lundin Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities