PortfoliosLab logo
EGO vs. KGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EGO and KGC is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EGO vs. KGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EGO:

0.71

KGC:

2.43

Sortino Ratio

EGO:

1.21

KGC:

3.20

Omega Ratio

EGO:

1.16

KGC:

1.42

Calmar Ratio

EGO:

0.36

KGC:

1.70

Martin Ratio

EGO:

2.55

KGC:

20.80

Ulcer Index

EGO:

12.42%

KGC:

6.02%

Daily Std Dev

EGO:

43.21%

KGC:

42.95%

Max Drawdown

EGO:

-97.49%

KGC:

-96.04%

Current Drawdown

EGO:

-81.32%

KGC:

-43.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EGO:

$4.06B

KGC:

$18.49B

EPS

EGO:

$1.64

KGC:

$0.98

PE Ratio

EGO:

11.99

KGC:

15.37

PEG Ratio

EGO:

10.65

KGC:

-3.90

PS Ratio

EGO:

2.85

KGC:

3.34

PB Ratio

EGO:

1.01

KGC:

2.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

EGO:

$1.42B

KGC:

$5.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EGO:

$619.30M

KGC:

$2.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

EGO:

$705.65M

KGC:

$2.23B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGO achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's 62.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EGO has underperformed KGC with an annualized return of -2.63%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively higher 20.77% annualized return.


EGO

YTD

32.28%

1M

1.71%

6M

18.14%

1Y

28.56%

5Y*

17.24%

10Y*

-2.63%

KGC

YTD

62.90%

1M

4.73%

6M

44.66%

1Y

100.96%

5Y*

19.22%

10Y*

20.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EGO vs. KGC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EGO is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EGO is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EGO is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EGO is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EGO is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EGO is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

KGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KGC is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KGC is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KGC is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KGC is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KGC is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KGC is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EGO vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the KGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGO and KGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EGO vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison

EGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EGO
Eldorado Gold Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.05%0.00%0.54%0.30%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.80%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.07%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EGO vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGO drawdown since its inception was -97.49%, roughly equal to the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGO and KGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EGO vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison

Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) has a higher volatility of 13.92% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 12.99%. This indicates that EGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EGO vs. KGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eldorado Gold Corporation and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20212022202320242025
355.25M
1.50B
(EGO) Total Revenue
(KGC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EGO vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Eldorado Gold Corporation and Kinross Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
41.3%
44.2%
(EGO) Gross Margin
(KGC) Gross Margin
EGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eldorado Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 146.77M and revenue of 355.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.3%.

KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 662.40M and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

EGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eldorado Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 114.23M and revenue of 355.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.2%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 557.80M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.3%.

EGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eldorado Gold Corporation reported a net income of 72.40M and revenue of 355.25M, resulting in a net margin of 20.4%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 368.00M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.