EGO vs. KGC

In the year-to-date period, EGO achieves a 33.15% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's 60.09% return. Over the past 10 years, EGO has underperformed KGC with an annualized return of -2.18%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively higher 21.79% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the KGC Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGO and KGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.

The maximum EGO drawdown since its inception was -97.49%, roughly equal to the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGO and KGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) has a higher volatility of 17.86% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 14.04%. This indicates that EGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eldorado Gold Corporation and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.