EGO vs. KGC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC).

Performance

EGO vs. KGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EGO vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EGO Eldorado Gold Corporation	0.75%	141.56%	14.65%	55.14%	-10.59%	-29.54%	65.26%	178.82%	-59.72%	-55.28%
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation	13.85%	206.11%	55.63%	51.83%	-27.59%	-19.00%	56.04%	46.30%	-25.00%	38.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap EGO : $7.22B KGC : $38.70B
EPS EGO : $2.50 KGC : $1.97
PE Ratio EGO : 14.44 KGC : 16.29
PEG Ratio EGO : 0.22 KGC : 0.22
PS Ratio EGO : 4.04 KGC : 5.53
PB Ratio EGO : 1.69 KGC : 4.52
Total Revenue (TTM) EGO : $1.82B KGC : $7.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) EGO : $845.38M KGC : $3.48B
EBITDA (TTM) EGO : $876.11M KGC : $4.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGO achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's 13.85% return. Over the past 10 years, EGO has underperformed KGC with an annualized return of 8.82%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively higher 26.22% annualized return.

EGO

• 1D: 5.24%
• 1M: -22.02%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 6M: 22.88%
• 1Y: 105.62%
• 3Y*: 51.73%
• 5Y*: 26.17%
• 10Y*: 8.82%

KGC

• 1D: 4.91%
• 1M: -12.86%
• YTD: 13.85%
• 6M: 26.14%
• 1Y: 155.70%
• 3Y*: 92.13%
• 5Y*: 38.11%
• 10Y*: 26.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EGO vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGO

EGO Risk / Return Rank: 87
EGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
EGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EGO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EGO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

KGC

KGC Risk / Return Rank: 94
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 93
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGO vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EGO	KGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	3.11	-1.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	3.04	-0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.45	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	5.15	-2.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.89	18.12	-7.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EGO vs. KGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the KGC Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGO and KGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EGO	KGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	3.11	-1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.88	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.55	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.09	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between EGO and KGC is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EGO vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison

EGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than KGC's 0.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EGO Eldorado Gold Corporation	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.40%	0.00%	0.67%
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation	0.42%	0.44%	1.29%	1.98%	2.93%	2.69%	0.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EGO vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGO drawdown since its inception was -97.49%, roughly equal to the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGO and KGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGO	KGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.49%	-96.00%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.73%	-30.20%	-6.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.70%	-61.44%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.51%	-67.75%	-21.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.53%	-15.79%	-49.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.58%	-57.84%	+2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.57%	8.58%	+1.99%

Volatility

EGO vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison

Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) has a higher volatility of 18.92% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 16.80%. This indicates that EGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGO	KGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.92%	16.80%	+2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.20%	41.14%	+2.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.85%	50.45%	+1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.35%	43.55%	+1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.46%	47.67%	+7.79%

Financials

EGO vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Eldorado Gold Corporation and Kinross Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eldorado Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 288.77M and revenue of 586.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.

EGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eldorado Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 268.67M and revenue of 586.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 985.01M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.

EGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eldorado Gold Corporation reported a net income of 244.52M and revenue of 586.03M, resulting in a net margin of 41.7%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 920.43M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 44.8%.