EG vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Everest Group Ltd (EG) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EG or MMC.
Correlation
The correlation between EG and MMC is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EG vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EG:
0.08
MMC:
0.83
EG:
0.26
MMC:
1.17
EG:
1.04
MMC:
1.15
EG:
0.13
MMC:
1.10
EG:
0.32
MMC:
3.52
EG:
6.08%
MMC:
3.31%
EG:
24.38%
MMC:
13.94%
EG:
-52.96%
MMC:
-67.46%
EG:
-8.38%
MMC:
-9.97%
Fundamentals
EG:
$15.58B
MMC:
$104.32B
EG:
$64.08
MMC:
$8.11
EG:
5.66
MMC:
26.19
EG:
-50.00
MMC:
2.25
EG:
$12.65B
MMC:
$18.39B
EG:
$12.67B
MMC:
$8.03B
EG:
$729.00M
MMC:
$5.55B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EG achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly higher than MMC's -1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EG has underperformed MMC with an annualized return of 10.53%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.03% annualized return.
EG
2.36%
-0.10%
0.56%
1.62%
8.53%
10.53%
MMC
-1.14%
-6.74%
-0.12%
11.19%
15.16%
16.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EG vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EG
MMC
EG vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everest Group Ltd (EG) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EG vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
EG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than MMC's 1.45% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EG Everest Group Ltd | 2.09% | 2.14% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 2.26% | 2.65% | 2.08% | 2.43% | 2.28% | 2.17% | 2.18% | 1.88% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.45% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
EG vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EG drawdown since its inception was -52.96%, smaller than the maximum MMC drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EG and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EG vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Everest Group Ltd (EG) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 4.43%. This indicates that EG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EG vs. MMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everest Group Ltd and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities