EFX vs. BWMN
EFX (Equifax Inc.) and BWMN (Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Consulting Services industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, EFX returned -6.72%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for BWMN. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EFX vs. BWMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFX achieves a -19.26% return, which is significantly lower than BWMN's -16.99% return.
EFX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- -12.04%
- YTD
- -19.26%
- 1Y
- -26.68%
- 3Y*
- -3.39%
- 5Y*
- -6.72%
- 10Y*
- 3.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.57%
BWMN
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- 6M
- -20.73%
- YTD
- -16.99%
- 1Y
- -18.33%
- 3Y*
- -7.74%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.33M | $3.95M | $4.25M | |
EFX Equifax Inc. | $389.43M | $318.60M | $294.36M |
EFX vs. BWMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFX Equifax Inc. | -19.26% | -14.19% | 3.67% | 28.18% | -33.09% | 24.01% |
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. | -16.99% | 32.34% | -29.76% | 62.56% | 2.85% | 51.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFX and BWMN is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2021 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
EFX:
$20.46B
BWMN:
$479.89M
EFX:
$5.69
BWMN:
$0.63
EFX:
30.63
BWMN:
43.22
EFX:
3.29
BWMN:
1.21
EFX:
4.74
BWMN:
1.80
EFX:
$6.44B
BWMN:
$377.09M
EFX:
$2.86B
BWMN:
$175.89M
EFX:
$1.90B
BWMN:
$42.71M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFX vs. BWMN — Risk / Return Rank
EFX
BWMN
EFX vs. BWMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equifax Inc. (EFX) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFX | BWMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.96 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | -0.43 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | -0.74 | -0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFX vs. BWMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFX drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, roughly equal to the maximum BWMN drawdown of -56.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFX and BWMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFX | BWMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.83% | -56.21% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.59% | -43.03% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.69% | -56.21% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.69% | -56.21% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.35% | -38.31% | -4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -21.09% | +5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.96% | 24.76% | +0.20% |
Volatility
EFX vs. BWMN - Volatility Comparison
Equifax Inc. (EFX) has a higher volatility of 14.17% compared to Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) at 10.10%. This indicates that EFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFX | BWMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.17% | 10.10% | +4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.23% | 30.04% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.45% | 45.73% | -7.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.19% | 47.21% | -13.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.92% | 46.63% | -14.71% |
Dividends
EFX vs. BWMN - Dividend Comparison
EFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while BWMN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFX Equifax Inc. | 1.22% | 0.87% | 0.61% | 0.63% | 0.80% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.11% | 1.68% | 1.32% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
Financials
EFX vs. BWMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Equifax Inc. and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EFX and BWMN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFX has higher volatility (14.17%) compared to BWMN (10.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFX dropped -56.83% vs BWMN's -56.21%.
BWMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFX and BWMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer