PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFV vs. HDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFV vs. HDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than HDEF's 5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, EFV has outperformed HDEF with an annualized return of 9.83%, while HDEF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.69% annualized return.


EFV

1D
0.36%
1M
1.53%
YTD
9.98%
6M
14.03%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
22.31%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
9.83%

HDEF

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
5.00%
6M
7.21%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
8.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFV vs. HDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
9.98%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
5.00%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EFV and HDEF is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.80

The correlation between EFV and HDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EFV vs. HDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFV
HDEF

Financial Services

36.9%
26.9%

Industrials

10.2%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
17.9%

Basic Materials

7.5%
0.7%

Healthcare

7.2%
14.0%

Energy

7.0%
13.8%

Utilities

5.9%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
3.9%

Communication Services

4.4%
4.0%

Technology

4.3%
0.6%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.9%

Financial Services

EFV
36.9%
HDEF
26.9%

Industrials

EFV
10.2%
HDEF
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

EFV
8.3%
HDEF
17.9%

Basic Materials

EFV
7.5%
HDEF
0.7%

Healthcare

EFV
7.2%
HDEF
14.0%

Energy

EFV
7.0%
HDEF
13.8%

Utilities

EFV
5.9%
HDEF
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EFV
4.8%
HDEF
3.9%

Communication Services

EFV
4.4%
HDEF
4.0%

Technology

EFV
4.3%
HDEF
0.6%

Real Estate

EFV
2.5%
HDEF
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFV vs. HDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFV vs. HDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFVHDEFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

1.41

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.71

1.99

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.13

+0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.95

6.67

+3.28

EFV vs. HDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the HDEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFV and HDEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFVHDEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.41

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.72

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.54

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.45

-0.18

Drawdowns

EFV vs. HDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than HDEF's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and HDEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFVHDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.94%

-36.43%

-27.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-8.03%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.72%

-11.15%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.84%

-23.63%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-36.43%

-6.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-4.78%

+3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-5.04%

-9.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.56%

+0.35%

Volatility

EFV vs. HDEF - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) at 3.93%. This indicates that EFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFVHDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

3.93%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

9.15%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.21%

11.64%

+2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

14.14%

+1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

16.24%

+1.62%

EFV vs. HDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than HDEF's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFV vs. HDEF - Dividend Comparison

EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than HDEF's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.78%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.61%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFV and HDEF have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFV has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to HDEF (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs HDEF's -36.43%.

On 10-year performance, EFV leads with 9.83% vs 8.69% for HDEF. On fees, HDEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EFV has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 8.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 3.61% for HDEF.

EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index, while HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.20% for HDEF.

EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFV and HDEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer