PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DGRW vs. EFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DGRW and EFT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

DGRW vs. EFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.15%
4.76%
DGRW
EFT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DGRW:

1.70

EFT:

1.43

Sortino Ratio

DGRW:

2.37

EFT:

1.97

Omega Ratio

DGRW:

1.31

EFT:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

DGRW:

2.96

EFT:

2.37

Martin Ratio

DGRW:

8.41

EFT:

8.56

Ulcer Index

DGRW:

2.20%

EFT:

1.58%

Daily Std Dev

DGRW:

10.91%

EFT:

9.45%

Max Drawdown

DGRW:

-32.04%

EFT:

-60.58%

Current Drawdown

DGRW:

-1.81%

EFT:

-0.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than EFT's 4.60% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRW has outperformed EFT with an annualized return of 13.18%, while EFT has yielded a comparatively lower 7.47% annualized return.


DGRW

YTD

3.56%

1M

2.43%

6M

7.15%

1Y

18.16%

5Y*

13.71%

10Y*

13.18%

EFT

YTD

4.60%

1M

1.92%

6M

4.76%

1Y

13.49%

5Y*

7.98%

10Y*

7.47%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DGRW vs. EFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DGRW is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DGRW is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DGRW is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DGRW is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DGRW is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DGRW is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFT is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFT is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFT is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFT is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFT is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFT is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DGRW vs. EFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DGRW, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.701.43
The chart of Sortino ratio for DGRW, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.371.97
The chart of Omega ratio for DGRW, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.311.27
The chart of Calmar ratio for DGRW, currently valued at 2.96, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.962.37
The chart of Martin ratio for DGRW, currently valued at 8.41, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.418.56
DGRW
EFT

The current DGRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the EFT Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRW and EFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.70
1.43
DGRW
EFT

Dividends

DGRW vs. EFT - Dividend Comparison

DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than EFT's 10.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund
1.49%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.91%2.20%2.42%1.73%2.13%2.18%1.79%
EFT
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust
10.06%10.52%11.09%9.85%5.26%5.88%7.41%6.77%5.73%6.03%7.17%6.36%

Drawdowns

DGRW vs. EFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum EFT drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and EFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.81%
-0.96%
DGRW
EFT

Volatility

DGRW vs. EFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is 2.98%, while Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that DGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.98%
4.09%
DGRW
EFT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab