EFT vs. RQI
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI).
Performance
EFT vs. RQI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFT vs. RQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | -4.39% | -3.77% | 13.17% | 27.14% | -19.69% | 21.00% | 2.41% | 16.85% | -6.14% | 1.63% |
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund | 9.09% | 2.07% | 8.04% | 15.74% | -31.07% | 56.64% | -9.28% | 54.62% | -11.11% | 11.73% |
Fundamentals
EFT:
$282.79M
RQI:
$1.64B
EFT:
$0.85
RQI:
$1.09
EFT:
12.53
RQI:
11.23
EFT:
4.70
RQI:
4.55
EFT:
0.85
RQI:
1.01
EFT:
$60.18M
RQI:
$360.06M
EFT:
$36.55M
RQI:
$283.39M
EFT:
$24.44M
RQI:
$130.74M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFT achieves a -4.39% return, which is significantly lower than RQI's 9.09% return. Over the past 10 years, EFT has underperformed RQI with an annualized return of 5.76%, while RQI has yielded a comparatively higher 7.96% annualized return.
EFT
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- -4.39%
- 6M
- -5.13%
- 1Y
- -6.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.76%
RQI
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 2.83%
- 1Y
- 5.87%
- 3Y*
- 9.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFT vs. RQI — Risk / Return Rank
EFT
RQI
EFT vs. RQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFT | RQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | 0.32 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | 0.55 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.07 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 0.45 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 1.44 | -2.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFT | RQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 0.32 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.23 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.30 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.27 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFT and RQI is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EFT vs. RQI - Dividend Comparison
EFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.86%, more than RQI's 9.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | 9.86% | 9.55% | 10.52% | 11.09% | 9.81% | 5.24% | 5.88% | 7.41% | 6.77% | 5.73% | 5.54% | 6.57% |
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund | 9.19% | 9.54% | 7.84% | 7.84% | 10.41% | 5.27% | 7.74% | 6.79% | 9.27% | 7.59% | 7.86% | 7.86% |
Drawdowns
EFT vs. RQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFT drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, smaller than the maximum RQI drawdown of -91.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFT and RQI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFT | RQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.58% | -91.59% | +31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.02% | -14.25% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.98% | -41.06% | +16.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.51% | -59.12% | +13.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.88% | -8.04% | -4.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -18.04% | +9.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.69% | 4.49% | +1.20% |
Volatility
EFT vs. RQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) is 5.25%, while Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that EFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFT | RQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 5.73% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 11.50% | -4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 18.39% | -4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 23.06% | -10.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 26.94% | -11.20% |
Financials
EFT vs. RQI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFT vs. RQI - Profitability Comparison
EFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 13.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RQI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund reported a gross profit of 43.68M and revenue of 55.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
EFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported an operating income of 13.37M and revenue of 13.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 95.7%.
RQI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund reported an operating income of -10.03M and revenue of 55.28M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.2%.
EFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported a net income of 7.76M and revenue of 13.97M, resulting in a net margin of 55.6%.
RQI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund reported a net income of -27.67M and revenue of 55.28M, resulting in a net margin of -50.1%.