EFR vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
EFR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust | -3.43% | -4.85% | 11.32% | 29.25% | -18.73% | 22.88% | 0.83% | 16.43% | -6.96% | 3.37% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFR achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EFR has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.12%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
EFR
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- 1Y
- -6.08%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
EFR
VOO
EFR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | 0.98 | -1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | 1.50 | -2.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.23 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 1.53 | -2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 7.29 | -8.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 0.98 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.70 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.78 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.83 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFR and VOO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EFR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
EFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.51%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust | 9.51% | 9.53% | 9.76% | 10.37% | 10.39% | 5.62% | 6.39% | 7.34% | 7.46% | 5.42% | 5.82% | 6.95% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
EFR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFR drawdown since its inception was -60.55%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.55% | -33.99% | -26.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -11.98% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | -24.52% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.04% | -33.99% | -8.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.32% | -6.29% | -6.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -3.72% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 2.52% | +2.19% |
Volatility
EFR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) is 4.82%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that EFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 5.29% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.13% | 9.44% | -3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 18.10% | -5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 16.82% | -3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 17.99% | -3.04% |