EFO vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK).
EFO and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both EFO and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFO or XLK.
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and XLK is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EFO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EFO:
0.29
XLK:
1.03
EFO:
0.56
XLK:
1.46
EFO:
1.07
XLK:
1.19
EFO:
0.30
XLK:
1.35
EFO:
0.85
XLK:
4.59
EFO:
8.70%
XLK:
4.99%
EFO:
25.45%
XLK:
22.30%
EFO:
-63.53%
XLK:
-82.05%
EFO:
-20.70%
XLK:
-2.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EFO has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 3.49%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 20.65% annualized return.
EFO
3.19%
3.19%
-8.11%
5.24%
0.20%
3.49%
XLK
0.68%
0.97%
6.36%
20.47%
20.38%
20.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFO vs. XLK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EFO
XLK
EFO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than XLK's 0.65% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 2.17% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 1.75% |
Drawdowns
EFO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) at 6.47%. This indicates that EFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.