PortfoliosLab logo
EFIV vs. XLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EFIV and XLG is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

EFIV vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

EFIV:

8.47%

XLG:

9.67%

Max Drawdown

EFIV:

-0.75%

XLG:

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

EFIV:

-0.28%

XLG:

-0.04%

Returns By Period


EFIV

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XLG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFIV vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFIV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EFIV vs. XLG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFIV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFIV is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFIV is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFIV is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFIV is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFIV is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFIV is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

XLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLG is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLG is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLG is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLG is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLG is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLG is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EFIV vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

EFIV vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

EFIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EFIV
SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EFIV vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -0.75%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EFIV vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...