PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAV vs. VXZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAV vs. VXZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than VXZ's -3.44% return.


EFAV

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
2.87%
6M
2.52%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
6.44%

VXZ

1D
-0.94%
1M
-5.63%
YTD
-3.44%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
-11.44%
3Y*
-11.36%
5Y*
-12.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAV vs. VXZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
2.87%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-8.14%
VXZ
iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN
-3.44%5.73%-12.65%-43.98%0.47%-16.38%72.77%-20.10%31.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAV and VXZ is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

-0.46

The correlation between EFAV and VXZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.46 (all time) to -0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAV vs. VXZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VXZ
VXZ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAV vs. VXZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFAVVXZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.91

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

-0.70

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.35

-1.38

+4.73

EFAV vs. VXZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAV Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the VXZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAV and VXZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFAV vs. VXZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum VXZ drawdown of -69.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and VXZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAVVXZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

-69.00%

+41.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-16.52%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

-36.45%

+27.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

-62.05%

+34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.48%

-66.50%

+60.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-36.96%

+32.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

8.31%

-5.64%

Volatility

EFAV vs. VXZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) is 3.06%, while iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that EFAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAVVXZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

3.99%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

13.63%

-5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

18.61%

-8.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.82%

29.07%

-17.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.05%

34.00%

-20.95%

EFAV vs. VXZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VXZ's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAV vs. VXZ - Dividend Comparison

EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, while VXZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
3.28%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
VXZ
iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAV and VXZ have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXZ has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to EFAV (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs VXZ's -69.00%.

EFAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAV and VXZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer