EFAV vs. VXZ
EFAV (iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) is a stock. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAV returned 6.73%/yr vs -13.46%/yr for VXZ. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. EFAV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for VXZ.
Performance
EFAV vs. VXZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than VXZ's -4.23% return.
EFAV
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.33%
VXZ
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 1Y
- -13.90%
- 3Y*
- -8.94%
- 5Y*
- -13.46%
- 10Y*
- —
EFAV vs. VXZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | 7.56% | 26.00% | 5.30% | 12.52% | -15.11% | 7.20% | -0.06% | 16.67% | -8.14% |
VXZ iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN | -4.23% | 5.73% | -12.65% | -43.98% | 0.47% | -16.38% | 72.77% | -20.10% | 31.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAV and VXZ is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018 | -0.46 |
The correlation between EFAV and VXZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.46 (all time) to -0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAV vs. VXZ — Risk / Return Rank
EFAV
VXZ
EFAV vs. VXZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFAV | VXZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.89 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | -0.73 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | -1.48 | +6.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFAV vs. VXZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum VXZ drawdown of -69.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and VXZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAV | VXZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -69.00% | +41.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -19.20% | +12.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.75% | -36.45% | +27.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.46% | -62.05% | +34.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -66.77% | +64.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -37.18% | +32.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 9.44% | -6.58% |
Volatility
EFAV vs. VXZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) is 2.90%, while iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that EFAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAV | VXZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 3.37% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.75% | 13.67% | -4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 18.71% | -8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 29.03% | -17.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.02% | 33.89% | -20.87% |
EFAV vs. VXZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VXZ's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFAV vs. VXZ - Dividend Comparison
EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, while VXZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.14% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
VXZ iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAV and VXZ have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXZ has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to EFAV (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs VXZ's -69.00%.
EFAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAV and VXZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer