EFAV vs. FTBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX).
EFAV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. FTBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 15, 2002.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFAV or FTBFX.
Key characteristics
| EFAV | FTBFX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.23% | -2.27% |
| 1Y Return | 2.10% | 0.59% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.37% | -2.53% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.88% | 0.95% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.68% | 1.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.17 | 0.08 |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.64% | 6.34% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.56% | -17.61% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.23% | -9.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAV and FTBFX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EFAV vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than FTBFX's -2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EFAV has outperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 3.68%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.99% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFAV vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFAV vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFAV vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison
EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than FTBFX's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.08% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% | 3.57% | 2.53% |
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 3.33% | 2.24% | 5.22% | 3.03% | 3.18% | 2.98% | 3.21% | 3.71% | 3.13% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
EFAV vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -17.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and FTBFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFAV vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) at 1.88%. This indicates that EFAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.