PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAV vs. EFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAV vs. EFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than EFAX's 7.52% return.


EFAV

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.83%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
5.92%

EFAX

1D
0.83%
1M
3.30%
YTD
7.52%
6M
9.91%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAV vs. EFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
4.42%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
7.52%31.30%4.78%18.02%-16.72%10.50%9.57%23.52%-14.78%23.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAV and EFAX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016

0.84

The correlation between EFAV and EFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAV vs. EFAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAV
EFAX

Financial Services

19.9%
18.6%

Industrials

15.1%
9.5%

Healthcare

12.4%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
3.8%

Communication Services

9.7%
3.2%

Utilities

9.1%
1.2%

Energy

8.2%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
6.1%

Technology

4.5%
11.6%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.6%
3.9%

Financial Services

EFAV
19.9%
EFAX
18.6%

Industrials

EFAV
15.1%
EFAX
9.5%

Healthcare

EFAV
12.4%
EFAX
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

EFAV
11.5%
EFAX
3.8%

Communication Services

EFAV
9.7%
EFAX
3.2%

Utilities

EFAV
9.1%
EFAX
1.2%

Energy

EFAV
8.2%
EFAX
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAV
5.2%
EFAX
6.1%

Technology

EFAV
4.5%
EFAX
11.6%

Real Estate

EFAV
2.9%
EFAX
1.6%

Basic Materials

EFAV
1.6%
EFAX
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAV vs. EFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAX
EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAV vs. EFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAVEFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.54

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.22

5.69

-1.47

EFAV vs. EFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAV Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the EFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAV and EFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAVEFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.22

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.46

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.53

0.00

Drawdowns

EFAV vs. EFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum EFAX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and EFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAVEFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

-32.53%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-12.38%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

-13.52%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

-31.67%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-1.02%

-4.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-6.96%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.34%

-1.02%

Volatility

EFAV vs. EFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) is 3.14%, while SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that EFAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAVEFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

5.12%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

13.13%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

15.67%

-5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.79%

16.66%

-4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

17.10%

-3.89%

EFAV vs. EFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EFAV and EFAX have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFAV vs. EFAX - Dividend Comparison

EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than EFAX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.06%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
3.19%3.31%2.74%2.71%2.81%2.58%1.69%2.71%3.05%2.89%0.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAV and EFAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFAX has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to EFAV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs EFAX's -32.53%.

On 5-year performance, EFAX leads with 7.65% vs 6.29% for EFAV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFAX has performed better with a 7.65% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV and EFAX have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

EFAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 3.06% for EFAV.

EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, while EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

EFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAV and EFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer