EFA vs. HYG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EFA (iShares MSCI EAFE ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (Net), while HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFA returned 9.14%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for HYG. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.

Performance

EFA vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFA achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, EFA has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 9.14%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.91% annualized return.

EFA

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 9.29%
• 6M: 11.52%
• 1Y: 21.48%
• 3Y*: 16.97%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: 9.14%

HYG

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: 1.84%
• 1Y: 6.51%
• 3Y*: 8.57%
• 5Y*: 3.81%
• 10Y*: 4.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFA vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF	9.29%	31.55%	3.49%	18.36%	-14.39%	11.45%	7.60%	22.04%	-13.82%	25.07%
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.51%	8.59%	7.97%	11.54%	-10.98%	3.76%	4.47%	14.09%	-2.02%	6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between EFA and HYG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2007	0.63

The correlation between EFA and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFA vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFA	HYG
Financial Services	24.6%	-
Industrials	19.9%	-
Healthcare	10.6%	-
Technology	10.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	-
Basic Materials	5.9%	-
Communication Services	4.5%	-
Energy	4.0%	-
Utilities	4.0%	99.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.4%

Return for Risk

EFA vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFA

EFA Risk / Return Rank: 42
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 41
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

HYG

HYG Risk / Return Rank: 57
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFA vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFA	HYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.72	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.59	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.33	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	2.79	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.08	12.34	-5.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFA vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFA and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFA	HYG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	1.72	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.51	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.59	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.46	-0.15

Drawdowns

EFA vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFA drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFA and HYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFA	HYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.04%	-34.25%	-26.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.42%	-2.34%	-9.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.05%	-4.56%	-9.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.53%	-15.79%	-13.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.19%	-22.03%	-12.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.09%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-3.24%	-8.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	0.53%	+2.51%

Volatility

EFA vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.21%. This indicates that EFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFA	HYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	1.21%	+3.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.53%	3.01%	+9.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	3.81%	+11.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.48%	7.53%	+8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.26%	8.29%	+8.97%

EFA vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFA vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

EFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than HYG's 5.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF	3.09%	3.38%	3.24%	2.98%	2.69%	3.33%	2.13%	3.10%	3.39%	2.57%	3.07%	2.76%
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	5.91%	5.71%	6.01%	5.74%	5.30%	4.02%	4.88%	4.99%	5.54%	5.12%	5.27%	5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFA and HYG in my portfolio?

EFA and HYG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFA or HYG?

EFA has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to HYG (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFA dropped -61.04% vs HYG's -34.25%.

Which ETF is better, EFA or HYG?

On 10-year performance, EFA leads with 9.14% vs 4.91% for HYG. On fees, EFA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFA or HYG?

Over the 10-year period, EFA has performed better with a 9.14% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFA or HYG?

EFA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFA or HYG?

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 3.09% for EFA.

What is the main difference between EFA and HYG?

EFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. EFA tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Net), while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for EFA and 0.49% for HYG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.