PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMX vs. SPYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMX vs. SPYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMX achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than SPYX's 9.59% return.


EEMX

1D
0.69%
1M
-2.50%
6M
9.90%
YTD
18.71%
1Y
37.30%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.29%

SPYX

1D
0.71%
1M
0.25%
6M
8.41%
YTD
9.59%
1Y
20.93%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$114.77K$173.22K$297.15K
$4.48M$4.14M$6.01M

EEMX vs. SPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF
18.71%35.23%7.22%9.80%-19.75%-3.57%19.55%18.56%-16.76%38.46%
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
9.59%17.87%25.46%26.38%-19.59%28.06%19.87%31.62%-4.26%23.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMX and SPYX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016

0.61

The correlation between EEMX and SPYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMX vs. SPYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMX
SPYX

Technology

47.1%
38.9%

Financial Services

19.2%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
9.8%

Communication Services

6.3%
10.3%

Industrials

6.3%
8.3%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.7%

Healthcare

2.6%
9.2%

Utilities

1.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.9%

Energy

0.4%
1.1%

Technology

EEMX
47.1%
SPYX
38.9%

Financial Services

EEMX
19.2%
SPYX
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMX
7.8%
SPYX
9.8%

Communication Services

EEMX
6.3%
SPYX
10.3%

Industrials

EEMX
6.3%
SPYX
8.3%

Basic Materials

EEMX
5.3%
SPYX
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

EEMX
2.7%
SPYX
4.7%

Healthcare

EEMX
2.6%
SPYX
9.2%

Utilities

EEMX
1.3%
SPYX
2.3%

Real Estate

EEMX
1.0%
SPYX
1.9%

Energy

EEMX
0.4%
SPYX
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMX vs. SPYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEMX
EEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYX
SPYX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEMX vs. SPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMXSPYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

1.94

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

8.39

-0.59

EEMX vs. SPYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the SPYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMX and SPYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMX vs. SPYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, which is greater than SPYX's maximum drawdown of -32.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMX and SPYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMXSPYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.90%

-32.84%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

-9.84%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-18.74%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.31%

-26.14%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.21%

-1.18%

-9.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.60%

-4.49%

-10.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

2.28%

+2.37%

Volatility

EEMX vs. SPYX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.58% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) at 3.52%. This indicates that EEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMXSPYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.58%

3.52%

+6.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.32%

10.34%

+12.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.34%

13.10%

+12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

17.16%

+2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

18.01%

+2.75%

EEMX vs. SPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMX vs. SPYX - Dividend Comparison

EEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than SPYX's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF
1.90%2.28%2.26%2.20%2.38%1.72%1.42%2.57%2.41%2.45%0.15%0.00%
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
0.86%0.91%1.05%1.21%1.41%1.04%1.33%1.56%1.92%1.68%1.91%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMX and SPYX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMX has higher volatility (9.58%) compared to SPYX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMX dropped -39.90% vs SPYX's -32.84%.

On 5-year performance, SPYX leads with 12.38% vs 7.90% for EEMX. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPYX has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EEMX.

EEMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.86% for SPYX.

EEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPYX is S&P 500. EEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index, while SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EEMX and 0.20% for SPYX.

SPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMX and SPYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer