EEMX vs. SPYX
EEMX (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and SPYX (State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index, while SPYX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEMX returned 9.07%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for SPYX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPYX.
Performance
EEMX vs. SPYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMX achieves a 32.21% return, which is significantly higher than SPYX's 8.96% return.
EEMX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 9.19%
- YTD
- 32.21%
- 6M
- 33.98%
- 1Y
- 59.90%
- 3Y*
- 26.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 26.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
EEMX vs. SPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 32.21% | 35.23% | 7.22% | 9.80% | -19.75% | -3.57% | 19.55% | 18.56% | -16.76% | 38.46% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 8.96% | 17.87% | 25.46% | 26.38% | -19.59% | 28.06% | 19.87% | 31.62% | -4.26% | 23.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMX and SPYX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016 | 0.60 |
The correlation between EEMX and SPYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EEMX vs. SPYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMX
SPYX
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
EEMX
SPYX
Financial Services
EEMX
SPYX
Consumer Cyclical
EEMX
SPYX
Communication Services
EEMX
SPYX
Basic Materials
EEMX
SPYX
Industrials
EEMX
SPYX
Consumer Defensive
EEMX
SPYX
Healthcare
EEMX
SPYX
Utilities
EEMX
SPYX
Real Estate
EEMX
SPYX
Energy
EEMX
SPYX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMX vs. SPYX — Risk / Return Rank
EEMX
SPYX
EEMX vs. SPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMX | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.37 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 2.66 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.38 | 11.88 | +4.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMX vs. SPYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, which is greater than SPYX's maximum drawdown of -32.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMX and SPYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMX | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.90% | -32.84% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -9.84% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -18.74% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.99% | -26.14% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.75% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -4.52% | -10.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 2.20% | +1.47% |
Volatility
EEMX vs. SPYX - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) has a higher volatility of 11.25% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) at 4.78%. This indicates that EEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMX | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.25% | 4.78% | +6.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.64% | 10.08% | +10.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.84% | 12.76% | +10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 17.14% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 18.06% | +2.48% |
EEMX vs. SPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMX vs. SPYX - Dividend Comparison
EEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than SPYX's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 1.71% | 2.28% | 2.26% | 2.20% | 2.38% | 1.72% | 1.42% | 2.57% | 2.41% | 2.45% | 0.15% | 0.00% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 1.08% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.92% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMX and SPYX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMX has higher volatility (11.25%) compared to SPYX (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMX dropped -39.90% vs SPYX's -32.84%.
On 5-year performance, SPYX leads with 13.12% vs 9.07% for EEMX. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 9.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EEMX.
EEMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.08% for SPYX.
EEMX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SPYX is S&P 500. EEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index, while SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EEMX and 0.20% for SPYX.
EEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMX and SPYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer