PortfoliosLab logo
EEMV vs. FSPSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EEMV and FSPSX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EEMV vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EEMV:

0.91

FSPSX:

0.69

Sortino Ratio

EEMV:

1.42

FSPSX:

1.08

Omega Ratio

EEMV:

1.20

FSPSX:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

EEMV:

0.89

FSPSX:

0.88

Martin Ratio

EEMV:

2.61

FSPSX:

2.54

Ulcer Index

EEMV:

4.26%

FSPSX:

4.69%

Daily Std Dev

EEMV:

11.48%

FSPSX:

16.72%

Max Drawdown

EEMV:

-31.56%

FSPSX:

-33.69%

Current Drawdown

EEMV:

-0.96%

FSPSX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 14.66% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMV has underperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 2.36%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.60% annualized return.


EEMV

YTD

5.60%

1M

6.97%

6M

5.28%

1Y

10.38%

5Y*

6.80%

10Y*

2.36%

FSPSX

YTD

14.66%

1M

9.70%

6M

12.92%

1Y

11.55%

5Y*

12.85%

10Y*

5.60%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EEMV vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EEMV vs. FSPSX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EEMV is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EEMV is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EEMV is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EEMV is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EEMV is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EEMV is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSPSX is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSPSX is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSPSX is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSPSX is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSPSX is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSPSX is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EEMV vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EEMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMV and FSPSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EEMV vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than FSPSX's 2.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
3.31%3.50%2.75%1.93%2.14%2.45%2.63%2.46%2.34%2.79%2.55%2.71%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.53%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.36%2.99%2.79%3.53%

Drawdowns

EEMV vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum FSPSX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and FSPSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EEMV vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) have volatilities of 3.04% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...