PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EEMS vs. SCHD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EEMS and SCHD is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

EEMS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-4.94%
4.26%
EEMS
SCHD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EEMS:

0.18

SCHD:

1.19

Sortino Ratio

EEMS:

0.31

SCHD:

1.76

Omega Ratio

EEMS:

1.04

SCHD:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

EEMS:

0.20

SCHD:

1.70

Martin Ratio

EEMS:

0.48

SCHD:

4.36

Ulcer Index

EEMS:

4.66%

SCHD:

3.10%

Daily Std Dev

EEMS:

12.72%

SCHD:

11.38%

Max Drawdown

EEMS:

-48.89%

SCHD:

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

EEMS:

-8.34%

SCHD:

-3.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMS achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 3.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMS has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 4.71%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.18% annualized return.


EEMS

YTD

-0.88%

1M

1.19%

6M

-4.94%

1Y

1.45%

5Y*

8.42%

10Y*

4.71%

SCHD

YTD

3.15%

1M

0.68%

6M

4.27%

1Y

13.92%

5Y*

11.66%

10Y*

11.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EEMS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMS has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
Expense ratio chart for EEMS: current value at 0.69% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.69%
Expense ratio chart for SCHD: current value at 0.06% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.06%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EEMS vs. SCHD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EEMS is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EEMS is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EEMS is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EEMS is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EEMS is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EEMS is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHD is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHD is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHD is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHD is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHD is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHD is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EEMS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EEMS, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.181.19
The chart of Sortino ratio for EEMS, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.311.76
The chart of Omega ratio for EEMS, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.041.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for EEMS, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.201.70
The chart of Martin ratio for EEMS, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.484.36
EEMS
SCHD

The current EEMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMS and SCHD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.18
1.19
EEMS
SCHD

Dividends

EEMS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than SCHD's 3.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.62%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%2.67%
SCHD
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
3.53%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%2.63%

Drawdowns

EEMS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMS drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMS and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-8.34%
-3.68%
EEMS
SCHD

Volatility

EEMS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 3.37% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.37%
3.33%
EEMS
SCHD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab