EEMA vs. VWO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO).
EEMA and VWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EEMA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index. It was launched on Feb 8, 2012. VWO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Emerging Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. Both EEMA and VWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EEMA or VWO.
Correlation
The correlation between EEMA and VWO is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EEMA vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EEMA:
0.77
VWO:
0.85
EEMA:
1.20
VWO:
1.28
EEMA:
1.15
VWO:
1.16
EEMA:
0.41
VWO:
0.55
EEMA:
3.04
VWO:
3.62
EEMA:
4.58%
VWO:
3.56%
EEMA:
17.99%
VWO:
15.10%
EEMA:
-44.18%
VWO:
-67.68%
EEMA:
-22.11%
VWO:
-11.12%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EEMA having a 10.31% return and VWO slightly higher at 10.41%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EEMA having a 4.24% annualized return and VWO not far behind at 4.11%.
EEMA
10.31%
-1.99%
-0.72%
13.12%
2.18%
4.24%
VWO
10.41%
-1.03%
2.23%
12.10%
3.07%
4.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EEMA vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EEMA vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EEMA vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
EEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than VWO's 0.76% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 1.74% | 2.25% | 1.78% | 2.19% | 1.15% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 1.73% | 1.74% | 2.44% | 1.33% | 2.42% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 0.76% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.24% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.86% | 2.73% |
Drawdowns
EEMA vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMA drawdown since its inception was -44.18%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMA and VWO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EEMA vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) is 3.99%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that EEMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.