PortfoliosLab logo
EEMA vs. VWO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EEMA and VWO is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EEMA vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EEMA:

0.52

VWO:

0.67

Sortino Ratio

EEMA:

0.96

VWO:

1.10

Omega Ratio

EEMA:

1.12

VWO:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

EEMA:

0.42

VWO:

0.67

Martin Ratio

EEMA:

1.65

VWO:

2.21

Ulcer Index

EEMA:

7.49%

VWO:

5.89%

Daily Std Dev

EEMA:

22.16%

VWO:

18.64%

Max Drawdown

EEMA:

-44.18%

VWO:

-67.68%

Current Drawdown

EEMA:

-15.51%

VWO:

-4.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMA achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 7.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EEMA having a 3.83% annualized return and VWO not far behind at 3.65%.


EEMA

YTD

8.56%

1M

10.20%

6M

4.24%

1Y

11.44%

5Y*

6.77%

10Y*

3.83%

VWO

YTD

7.49%

1M

9.72%

6M

4.21%

1Y

12.31%

5Y*

8.88%

10Y*

3.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EEMA vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EEMA vs. VWO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EEMA is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EEMA is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EEMA is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EEMA is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EEMA is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EEMA is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VWO is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VWO is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VWO is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VWO is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VWO is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VWO is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EEMA vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EEMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is comparable to the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMA and VWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EEMA vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

EEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than VWO's 3.00% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EEMA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
1.60%1.74%2.25%1.78%2.19%1.15%1.86%2.17%1.73%1.74%2.44%1.33%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
3.00%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.24%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%2.86%

Drawdowns

EEMA vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMA drawdown since its inception was -44.18%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMA and VWO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EEMA vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 5.01%. This indicates that EEMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...