PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EELV vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EELV vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EELV achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly lower than SPEM's 12.50% return. Over the past 10 years, EELV has underperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 6.55%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.37% annualized return.


EELV

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
4.49%
6M
5.24%
1Y
14.63%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
6.55%

SPEM

1D
0.04%
1M
1.99%
YTD
12.50%
6M
13.96%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EELV vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
4.49%21.97%1.90%8.85%-3.98%16.15%-3.89%8.89%-5.40%24.89%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
12.50%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between EELV and SPEM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2012

0.85

The correlation between EELV and SPEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EELV vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EELV
SPEM

Financial Services

37.4%
20.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
3.9%

Communication Services

9.6%
7.2%

Utilities

9.6%
2.8%

Industrials

8.9%
8.5%

Energy

6.5%
4.7%

Healthcare

5.4%
4.0%

Basic Materials

5.3%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
10.4%

Real Estate

2.6%
1.9%

Technology

0.2%
28.2%

Financial Services

EELV
37.4%
SPEM
20.2%

Consumer Defensive

EELV
10.8%
SPEM
3.9%

Communication Services

EELV
9.6%
SPEM
7.2%

Utilities

EELV
9.6%
SPEM
2.8%

Industrials

EELV
8.9%
SPEM
8.5%

Energy

EELV
6.5%
SPEM
4.7%

Healthcare

EELV
5.4%
SPEM
4.0%

Basic Materials

EELV
5.3%
SPEM
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EELV
3.8%
SPEM
10.4%

Real Estate

EELV
2.6%
SPEM
1.9%

Technology

EELV
0.2%
SPEM
28.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EELV vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EELV
EELV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EELV vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EELVSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.67

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.02

9.75

-3.73

EELV vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EELV Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EELV and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EELVSPEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.91

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.34

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.50

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.23

+0.07

Drawdowns

EELV vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EELV drawdown since its inception was -36.35%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELV and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EELVSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.35%

-64.41%

+28.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-11.36%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.79%

-17.62%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-31.88%

+12.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.35%

-36.06%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-1.37%

-2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-14.75%

+5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

3.10%

-0.66%

Volatility

EELV vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) is 3.39%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that EELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EELVSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

5.58%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

13.28%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

15.92%

-5.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.36%

17.13%

-5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

18.80%

-5.16%

EELV vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EELV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

EELV vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

EELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than SPEM's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
3.58%3.75%4.70%4.00%3.45%4.35%2.82%3.14%5.50%2.92%2.29%2.53%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.47%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


EELV and SPEM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to EELV (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EELV dropped -36.35% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, SPEM leads with 9.37% vs 6.55% for EELV. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, EELV has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPEM has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EELV.

EELV has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 2.47% for SPEM.

EELV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SPEM is Emerging Markets Equities. EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EELV and 0.11% for SPEM.

SPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EELV and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer