EDV vs. VNQI
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI).
EDV and VNQI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2007. VNQI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2010. Both EDV and VNQI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EDV or VNQI.
Key characteristics
| EDV | VNQI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -12.99% | -1.53% |
| 1Y Return | -19.33% | 5.23% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -15.97% | -6.79% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -6.45% | -2.85% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -0.34% | 1.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.81 | 0.36 |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.21% | 15.56% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.96% | -38.35% |
| Current Drawdown | -54.66% | -23.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDV and VNQI is -0.17. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
EDV vs. VNQI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EDV achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than VNQI's -1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EDV has underperformed VNQI with an annualized return of -0.34%, while VNQI has yielded a comparatively higher 1.16% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDV vs. VNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQI's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EDV vs. VNQI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EDV vs. VNQI - Dividend Comparison
EDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than VNQI's 3.79% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | 4.26% | 3.55% | 3.28% | 1.95% | 5.54% | 3.51% | 2.90% | 2.92% | 5.32% | 4.24% | 3.12% | 5.03% |
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF | 3.79% | 3.74% | 0.57% | 6.48% | 0.93% | 7.58% | 4.62% | 3.86% | 5.18% | 2.86% | 4.11% | 3.27% |
Drawdowns
EDV vs. VNQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDV drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, which is greater than VNQI's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDV and VNQI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EDV vs. VNQI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) have volatilities of 5.45% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.