PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDUC vs. LKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EDUC vs. LKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) and LKQ Corporation (LKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDUC achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly higher than LKQ's -14.04% return. Over the past 10 years, EDUC has underperformed LKQ with an annualized return of -12.56%, while LKQ has yielded a comparatively higher -1.34% annualized return.


EDUC

1D
-2.63%
1M
9.63%
6M
4.23%
YTD
12.12%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
6.94%
5Y*
-32.70%
10Y*
-12.56%

LKQ

1D
0.12%
1M
-3.02%
6M
-21.81%
YTD
-14.04%
1Y
-31.41%
3Y*
-21.69%
5Y*
-10.64%
10Y*
-1.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDUC vs. LKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDUC
Educational Development Corporation
12.12%-20.00%42.24%-63.29%-64.61%-39.04%155.26%-25.46%-8.71%90.45%
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
-14.04%-14.99%-20.92%-8.56%-9.24%71.09%-1.29%50.44%-41.65%32.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EDUC and LKQ is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2003

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EDUC:

$12.62M

LKQ:

$6.47B

EPS

EDUC:

$0.35

LKQ:

$2.02

PE Ratio

EDUC:

4.19

LKQ:

12.60

PS Ratio

EDUC:

0.66

LKQ:

0.47

PB Ratio

EDUC:

0.30

LKQ:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

EDUC:

$19.25M

LKQ:

$13.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EDUC:

$12.29M

LKQ:

$5.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

EDUC:

$8.87M

LKQ:

$1.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LKQ Corporation

Return for Risk

EDUC vs. LKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDUC
EDUC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EDUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDUC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EDUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDUC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

LKQ
LKQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
LKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDUC vs. LKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) and LKQ Corporation (LKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDUCLKQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.85

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

-0.91

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.50

-1.50

+2.01

EDUC vs. LKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDUC Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the LKQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDUC and LKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDUC vs. LKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDUC drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than LKQ's maximum drawdown of -68.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDUC and LKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDUCLKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.59%

-68.02%

-27.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.11%

-34.54%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.54%

-54.50%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.87%

-54.80%

-38.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.59%

-68.02%

-27.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.93%

-52.64%

-39.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.67%

-16.14%

-28.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.58%

20.96%

+0.62%

Volatility

EDUC vs. LKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) is 8.38%, while LKQ Corporation (LKQ) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that EDUC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDUCLKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

9.61%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.26%

23.75%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.48%

36.17%

+23.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.92%

30.04%

+35.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.52%

33.73%

+28.79%

Dividends

EDUC vs. LKQ - Dividend Comparison

EDUC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDUC
Educational Development Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.16%4.42%1.76%3.24%1.76%0.00%3.62%3.07%
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
4.72%3.97%3.27%2.35%1.92%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EDUC vs. LKQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Educational Development Corporation and LKQ Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
4.54M
3.47B
(EDUC) Total Revenue
(LKQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EDUC vs. LKQ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Educational Development Corporation and LKQ Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
62.2%
38.4%
Portfolio components
EDUC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Educational Development Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.82M and revenue of 4.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.2%.

LKQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LKQ Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.33B and revenue of 3.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

EDUC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Educational Development Corporation reported an operating income of 73.90K and revenue of 4.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.

LKQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LKQ Corporation reported an operating income of 217.00M and revenue of 3.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

EDUC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Educational Development Corporation reported a net income of -1.40M and revenue of 4.54M, resulting in a net margin of -30.8%.

LKQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LKQ Corporation reported a net income of 79.00M and revenue of 3.47B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EDUC and LKQ have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LKQ has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to EDUC (8.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDUC dropped -95.59% vs LKQ's -68.02%.

EDUC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDUC and LKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer