EDUC vs. LKQ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EDUC (Educational Development Corporation) and LKQ (LKQ Corporation) are both stocks. EDUC operates in Publishing (Communication Services), while LKQ operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, EDUC returned -11.33%/yr vs -1.20%/yr for LKQ. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EDUC vs. LKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) and LKQ Corporation (LKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDUC achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than LKQ's -13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EDUC has underperformed LKQ with an annualized return of -11.33%, while LKQ has yielded a comparatively higher -1.20% annualized return.

EDUC

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 2.84%
• YTD: 9.85%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 2.84%
• 3Y*: 4.80%
• 5Y*: -35.37%
• 10Y*: -11.33%

LKQ

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: -8.98%
• YTD: -13.23%
• 6M: -10.20%
• 1Y: -33.37%
• 3Y*: -19.34%
• 5Y*: -10.27%
• 10Y*: -1.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDUC vs. LKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDUC Educational Development Corporation	9.85%	-20.00%	42.24%	-63.29%	-64.61%	-39.04%	155.26%	-25.46%	-8.71%	90.45%
LKQ LKQ Corporation	-13.23%	-14.99%	-20.92%	-8.56%	-9.24%	71.09%	-1.29%	50.44%	-41.65%	32.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EDUC and LKQ is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2003	0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap EDUC : $12.34M LKQ : $6.56B
EPS EDUC : $0.39 LKQ : $2.01
PE Ratio EDUC : 3.72 LKQ : 12.75
PS Ratio EDUC : 0.57 LKQ : 0.47
PB Ratio EDUC : 0.29 LKQ : 1.02
Total Revenue (TTM) EDUC : $21.81M LKQ : $13.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) EDUC : $13.60M LKQ : $5.25B
EBITDA (TTM) EDUC : $14.11M LKQ : $1.37B

Return for Risk

EDUC vs. LKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDUC

EDUC Risk / Return Rank: 43
EDUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EDUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EDUC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
EDUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
EDUC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

LKQ

LKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6
LKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
LKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
LKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
LKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDUC vs. LKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) and LKQ Corporation (LKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDUC	LKQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	-0.94	+0.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	-1.20	+1.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.83	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	-0.91	+1.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.31	-1.57	+1.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDUC vs. LKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDUC Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is higher than the LKQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDUC and LKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDUC	LKQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05	-0.94	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.53	-0.34	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.18	-0.04	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.36	-0.28

Drawdowns

EDUC vs. LKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDUC drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than LKQ's maximum drawdown of -68.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDUC and LKQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDUC	LKQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.59%	-68.02%	-27.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.11%	-37.40%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.54%	-54.80%	-8.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.92%	-54.80%	-39.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.59%	-68.02%	-27.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.10%	-52.20%	-39.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.52%	-15.98%	-28.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.07%	21.69%	-0.62%

Volatility

EDUC vs. LKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) is 6.72%, while LKQ Corporation (LKQ) has a volatility of 12.51%. This indicates that EDUC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDUC	LKQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.72%	12.51%	-5.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.88%	24.81%	-3.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.87%	35.44%	+24.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.38%	29.95%	+36.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.76%	33.81%	+28.95%

Dividends

EDUC vs. LKQ - Dividend Comparison

EDUC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDUC Educational Development Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.16%	4.42%	1.76%	3.24%	1.76%	0.00%	3.62%	3.07%
LKQ LKQ Corporation	4.68%	3.97%	3.27%	2.35%	1.92%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDUC and LKQ in my portfolio?

EDUC and LKQ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDUC or LKQ?

LKQ has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to EDUC (6.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDUC dropped -95.59% vs LKQ's -68.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDUC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.