EDOW vs. XLV
EDOW (First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOW returned 8.89%/yr vs 5.55%/yr for XLV. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDOW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
EDOW vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -4.29% return.
EDOW
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- —
XLV
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- -4.29%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- 12.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
EDOW vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 5.68% | 15.46% | 13.17% | 15.47% | -7.45% | 18.82% | 6.64% | 24.69% | -2.04% | 11.90% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -4.29% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOW and XLV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between EDOW and XLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EDOW vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDOW
XLV
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
EDOW
XLV
-
Financial Services
EDOW
XLV
-
Industrials
EDOW
XLV
-
Healthcare
EDOW
XLV
Consumer Cyclical
EDOW
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
EDOW
XLV
-
Communication Services
EDOW
XLV
-
Energy
EDOW
XLV
-
Basic Materials
EDOW
XLV
-
Real Estate
EDOW
-
XLV
-
Utilities
EDOW
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOW vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
EDOW
XLV
EDOW vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDOW | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.16 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.24 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 2.99 | +4.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDOW | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 0.88 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.38 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.46 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
EDOW vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOW | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -39.17% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -10.47% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.51% | -17.11% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -17.11% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -7.52% | +6.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -7.12% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 4.32% | -1.97% |
Volatility
EDOW vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) is 2.74%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that EDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOW | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 4.10% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.92% | 10.24% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 14.67% | -3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 14.69% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 16.55% | +1.19% |
EDOW vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOW vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than XLV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 1.91% | 1.52% | 1.84% | 1.88% | 1.82% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.70% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOW and XLV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to EDOW (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOW dropped -33.72% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 5-year performance, EDOW leads with 8.89% vs 5.55% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EDOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EDOW has performed better with a 8.89% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EDOW.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.24% for EDOW.
EDOW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. EDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.08% for XLV.
EDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOW and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer