PortfoliosLab logo
EDEN vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EDEN and VGT is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EDEN vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EDEN:

-0.39

VGT:

0.47

Sortino Ratio

EDEN:

-0.47

VGT:

0.71

Omega Ratio

EDEN:

0.94

VGT:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

EDEN:

-0.30

VGT:

0.40

Martin Ratio

EDEN:

-0.63

VGT:

1.29

Ulcer Index

EDEN:

13.80%

VGT:

8.45%

Daily Std Dev

EDEN:

20.55%

VGT:

30.25%

Max Drawdown

EDEN:

-36.61%

VGT:

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

EDEN:

-12.56%

VGT:

-6.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDEN achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, EDEN has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 9.13%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.78% annualized return.


EDEN

YTD

8.45%

1M

7.80%

6M

1.28%

1Y

-7.87%

3Y*

8.37%

5Y*

11.21%

10Y*

9.13%

VGT

YTD

-2.36%

1M

10.36%

6M

-2.31%

1Y

13.93%

3Y*

19.73%

5Y*

19.26%

10Y*

19.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares MSCI Denmark ETF

EDEN vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EDEN vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EDEN is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EDEN is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EDEN is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EDEN is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EDEN is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EDEN is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EDEN vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EDEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDEN and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EDEN vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than VGT's 0.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
1.38%1.50%1.92%1.47%0.74%0.42%2.36%2.01%2.03%1.28%1.46%0.87%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.53%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%1.12%

Drawdowns

EDEN vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and VGT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EDEN vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is 5.65%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that EDEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...