EDEN vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
EDEN and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDEN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2012. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both EDEN and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EDEN or QQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between EDEN and QQQ is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EDEN vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EDEN:
0.21
QQQ:
1.54
EDEN:
0.40
QQQ:
2.06
EDEN:
1.05
QQQ:
1.28
EDEN:
0.20
QQQ:
2.03
EDEN:
0.57
QQQ:
7.34
EDEN:
5.76%
QQQ:
3.75%
EDEN:
15.95%
QQQ:
17.90%
EDEN:
-36.61%
QQQ:
-82.98%
EDEN:
-16.33%
QQQ:
-4.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDEN achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 26.66% return. Over the past 10 years, EDEN has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.40%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.30% annualized return.
EDEN
-0.32%
-0.95%
-11.39%
2.18%
11.67%
10.40%
QQQ
26.66%
3.29%
6.76%
26.84%
20.38%
18.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDEN vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EDEN vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EDEN vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 1.74% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% | 0.87% | 0.86% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.43% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
EDEN vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EDEN vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is 4.08%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that EDEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.