PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ED vs. ABBV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ED and ABBV is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

ED vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
150.20%
711.84%
ED
ABBV

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ED:

0.26

ABBV:

0.84

Sortino Ratio

ED:

0.48

ABBV:

1.16

Omega Ratio

ED:

1.06

ABBV:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

ED:

0.26

ABBV:

1.05

Martin Ratio

ED:

0.81

ABBV:

2.88

Ulcer Index

ED:

5.32%

ABBV:

6.95%

Daily Std Dev

ED:

16.59%

ABBV:

23.75%

Max Drawdown

ED:

-74.02%

ABBV:

-45.09%

Current Drawdown

ED:

-15.45%

ABBV:

-13.88%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ED:

$31.47B

ABBV:

$309.92B

EPS

ED:

$5.32

ABBV:

$2.88

PE Ratio

ED:

17.08

ABBV:

60.90

PEG Ratio

ED:

8.67

ABBV:

0.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

ED:

$15.04B

ABBV:

$55.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ED:

$8.46B

ABBV:

$42.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

ED:

$5.88B

ABBV:

$24.24B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ED achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than ABBV's 17.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ED has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 7.02%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.26% annualized return.


ED

YTD

2.46%

1M

-8.02%

6M

1.34%

1Y

4.48%

5Y*

3.61%

10Y*

7.02%

ABBV

YTD

17.45%

1M

4.66%

6M

4.83%

1Y

19.28%

5Y*

19.53%

10Y*

15.26%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ED vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ED, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.260.84
The chart of Sortino ratio for ED, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.481.16
The chart of Omega ratio for ED, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.061.19
The chart of Calmar ratio for ED, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.261.05
The chart of Martin ratio for ED, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.812.88
ED
ABBV

The current ED Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ED and ABBV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.26
0.84
ED
ABBV

Dividends

ED vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

ED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than ABBV's 3.53% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
3.69%3.56%3.32%3.63%4.23%3.27%3.74%3.25%3.64%4.05%3.82%4.45%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
3.53%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%2.54%3.03%

Drawdowns

ED vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ED drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED and ABBV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-15.45%
-13.88%
ED
ABBV

Volatility

ED vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) is 5.32%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that ED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.32%
6.74%
ED
ABBV

Financials

ED vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consolidated Edison, Inc. and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab