ECOW vs. FLQH
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and Franklin LibertyQ International Equity Hedged ETF (FLQH).
ECOW and FLQH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. FLQH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the LibertyQ International Equity Hedged Index. It was launched on Jun 1, 2016. Both ECOW and FLQH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ECOW or FLQH.
Key characteristics
| ECOW | FLQH |
|---|
Correlation
The correlation between ECOW and FLQH is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ECOW vs. FLQH - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECOW vs. FLQH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECOW has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQH's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ECOW vs. FLQH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and Franklin LibertyQ International Equity Hedged ETF (FLQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ECOW vs. FLQH - Dividend Comparison
ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, while FLQH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 5.06% | 5.46% | 7.50% | 4.39% | 3.35% | 8.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLQH Franklin LibertyQ International Equity Hedged ETF | 3.08% | 3.17% | 0.87% | 2.77% | 6.23% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 4.02% | 11.56% |
Drawdowns
ECOW vs. FLQH - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
ECOW vs. FLQH - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Franklin LibertyQ International Equity Hedged ETF (FLQH) at 0.00%. This indicates that ECOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.