PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EC vs. MARA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EC vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EC achieves a 63.21% return, which is significantly higher than MARA's 55.46% return. Over the past 10 years, EC has outperformed MARA with an annualized return of 16.83%, while MARA has yielded a comparatively lower -10.91% annualized return.


EC

1D
-2.50%
1M
11.05%
YTD
63.21%
6M
61.44%
1Y
100.00%
3Y*
40.47%
5Y*
21.16%
10Y*
16.83%

MARA

1D
-2.24%
1M
18.01%
YTD
55.46%
6M
11.95%
1Y
-8.94%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
-10.53%
10Y*
-10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EC vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EC
Ecopetrol S.A.
63.21%58.65%-24.25%41.83%-5.04%0.57%-29.31%38.58%11.95%64.34%
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
55.46%-46.45%-28.61%586.84%-89.59%214.75%1,084.48%-39.16%-91.17%-40.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EC and MARA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2012

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EC:

$32.03B

MARA:

$5.31B

EPS

EC:

$4.26K

MARA:

-$4.95

PS Ratio

EC:

0.00

MARA:

6.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

EC:

$116.38T

MARA:

$867.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EC:

$37.91T

MARA:

$164.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

EC:

$42.24T

MARA:

$373.68M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EC vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EC
EC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EC Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

MARA
MARA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MARA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MARA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EC vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECMARADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.05

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.62

-0.13

+7.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.65

-0.21

+17.87

EC vs. MARA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EC Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the MARA Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EC and MARA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECMARADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

-0.12

+2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

-0.10

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

-0.08

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.09

+0.23

Drawdowns

EC vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EC drawdown since its inception was -90.16%, smaller than the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EC and MARA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECMARADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.16%

-99.74%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.20%

-70.53%

+57.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.00%

-78.34%

+40.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.60%

-95.87%

+47.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.36%

-99.20%

+25.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.08%

-90.98%

+69.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.23%

-78.00%

+26.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

42.03%

-36.35%

Volatility

EC vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison

Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) have volatilities of 17.04% and 16.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECMARADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.04%

16.33%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.50%

58.00%

-27.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.38%

77.65%

-40.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.66%

105.79%

-68.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.81%

144.06%

-103.25%

Dividends

EC vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

EC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, while MARA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EC
Ecopetrol S.A.
7.58%20.77%20.47%22.02%22.47%0.72%6.92%9.87%4.01%1.06%0.00%14.83%
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EC vs. MARA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecopetrol S.A. and MARA Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00T20.00T30.00T40.00T20222023202420252026
28.41T
174.61M
(EC) Total Revenue
(MARA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EC and MARA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EC has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to MARA (16.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EC dropped -90.16% vs MARA's -99.74%.

EC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EC and MARA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer