PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EC vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ECET
YTD Return-28.65%33.93%
1Y Return-22.43%40.12%
3Y Return (Ann)-4.88%34.13%
5Y Return (Ann)-4.85%19.31%
10Y Return (Ann)-3.55%2.26%
Sharpe Ratio-0.772.57
Sortino Ratio-0.993.67
Omega Ratio0.881.46
Calmar Ratio-0.301.76
Martin Ratio-1.4721.25
Ulcer Index14.48%1.91%
Daily Std Dev27.55%15.79%
Max Drawdown-90.16%-87.81%
Current Drawdown-70.82%-1.45%

Fundamentals


ECET
Market Cap$15.34B$58.38B
EPS$1.74$1.36
PE Ratio4.2912.54
PEG Ratio0.300.55
Total Revenue (TTM)$95.71T$83.66B
Gross Profit (TTM)$31.17T$14.03B
EBITDA (TTM)$34.92T$12.39B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between EC and ET is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

EC vs. ET - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EC achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 33.93% return. Over the past 10 years, EC has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -3.55%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 2.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-34.14%
11.66%
EC
ET

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EC vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EC, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.77
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EC, currently valued at -0.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EC, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.88
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EC, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EC, currently valued at -1.47, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.47
ET
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ET, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.57
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ET, currently valued at 3.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.76
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ET, currently valued at 21.25, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0021.25

EC vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EC Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EC and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.77
2.57
EC
ET

Dividends

EC vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

EC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.21%, more than ET's 7.48% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EC
Ecopetrol S.A.
35.21%23.58%22.46%0.72%6.92%9.91%4.01%1.10%0.00%14.75%15.46%8.34%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.48%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%3.19%

Drawdowns

EC vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EC drawdown since its inception was -90.16%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EC and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-70.82%
-1.45%
EC
ET

Volatility

EC vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.47%. This indicates that EC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.02%
4.47%
EC
ET

Financials

EC vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecopetrol S.A. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items