PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EC vs. ET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EC vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EC achieves a 52.84% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 19.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EC has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 15.79%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 12.09% annualized return.


EC

1D
-5.93%
1M
5.34%
YTD
52.84%
6M
59.53%
1Y
72.54%
3Y*
35.15%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
15.79%

ET

1D
-1.46%
1M
-5.63%
YTD
19.03%
6M
19.76%
1Y
15.35%
3Y*
24.32%
5Y*
21.26%
10Y*
12.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EC vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EC
Ecopetrol S.A.
52.84%58.65%-24.25%41.83%-5.04%0.57%-29.31%38.58%11.95%64.34%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
19.03%-9.37%53.87%27.87%55.74%42.96%-44.92%5.88%-17.74%-4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EC and ET is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2008

0.39

The correlation between EC and ET shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EC:

$29.99B

ET:

$65.48B

EPS

EC:

COP 4.26K

ET:

$1.36

PE Ratio

EC:

11.71

ET:

13.92

PS Ratio

EC:

0.88

ET:

0.75

PB Ratio

EC:

1.28

ET:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

EC:

COP 116.38T

ET:

$89.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EC:

COP 37.91T

ET:

$20.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

EC:

COP 42.24T

ET:

$13.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EC vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EC
EC Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
ET Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EC vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.53

1.75

+3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.65

3.84

+8.80

EC vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EC Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EC and ET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EC vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EC drawdown since its inception was -90.16%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EC and ET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.16%

-87.81%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.20%

-8.79%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.00%

-24.56%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.60%

-24.56%

-24.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.36%

-72.82%

-0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.09%

-7.11%

-18.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.12%

-25.70%

-25.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

4.00%

+1.75%

Volatility

EC vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) has a higher volatility of 18.65% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.20%. This indicates that EC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.65%

5.20%

+13.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.59%

12.16%

+20.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.73%

16.17%

+22.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.75%

24.66%

+13.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.91%

34.50%

+6.41%

Dividends

EC vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

EC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.10%, more than ET's 7.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EC
Ecopetrol S.A.
8.10%20.77%20.47%22.02%22.47%0.72%6.92%9.87%4.01%1.06%0.00%14.83%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.05%7.97%6.51%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%

Financials

EC vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecopetrol S.A. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00T20.00T30.00T40.00T20222023202420252026
28.41T
27.77B
(EC) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. EC values in COP, ET values in USD

EC vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ecopetrol S.A. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
38.8%
23.9%
Portfolio components
EC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecopetrol S.A. reported a gross profit of 11.03T and revenue of 28.41T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

EC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecopetrol S.A. reported an operating income of 8.50T and revenue of 28.41T, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

EC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecopetrol S.A. reported a net income of 2.87T and revenue of 28.41T, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EC and ET have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EC has higher volatility (18.65%) compared to ET (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EC dropped -90.16% vs ET's -87.81%.

EC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EC and ET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer