EBS vs. SMH

In the year-to-date period, EBS achieves a -33.89% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's -1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, EBS has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -13.82%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emergent BioSolutions Inc. (EBS) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBS and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.

The maximum EBS drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBS and SMH.

Emergent BioSolutions Inc. (EBS) has a higher volatility of 40.84% compared to VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 9.05%. This indicates that EBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.